I’m still curious, 100 more hp and it ran .01 faster than stock drag trim?
Solid race and fast cars with simple bold ons
I was at this event. That Demon ran run after run right on his number... that Hellcat couldn’t put a run together until that pass. Still both cars were solid.
It’s my way of showing their run is not repeatable. I think in science, to be able to repeat the results of an experiment is a good thing.DA and track prep on this night vs. stock drag trim you are referring to? Conditions probably don’t matter in drag racing anyway.
or is this your passive aggressive way of calling the Demon slow again?
It’s my way of showing their run is not repeatable. I think in science, to be able to repeat the results of an experiment is a good thing.
Too much?
I will agree with your last point, pulley tune on a car under $100k is damn fast! Beer!
It’s my way of showing their run is not repeatable. I think in science, to be able to repeat the results of an experiment is a good thing.
Too much?
I will agree with your last point, pulley tune on a car under $100k is damn fast! Beer!
They ran it twice....first I heard of this. I heard they ran hour after hour with half the tracked soaked with vht to get that 9.65 run.They backed up the 9.65 run.
They claimed best power to weight after introduction? Yes this was a mistake, I believe the 675LT had it beat.Understand. FCA should have never made that claim so boldly, but holy cow, I think some people are living their lives with the goal of discrediting this car.
Was the 13-14 GT500 a total failure because ford claimed from high upon the mountain that it was a 200 mph car, but to my knowledge, no one has actually been able verifiably replicate it? Don’t seem to recall most folks giving the blue oval a hard time over that. Or their claim that the new Ford GT would have the best P:W ratio of any car? Does that make the cars any less awesome?
They ran it twice....first I heard of this. I heard they ran hour after hour with half the tracked soaked with vht to get that 9.65 run.
Same night I’m assuming.Leah Pritchett ran 9.65 and Jim Wilder, dodge engineer, ran 9.66.
I was at this event. That Demon ran run after run right on his number... that Hellcat couldn’t put a run together until that pass. Still both cars were solid.
Yeah, this is telling me that once the Redeye cars start hitting the drag strips with the same mods as that Demon, they will be fast and pretty consistent as well.Mid 9’s all night long with nothing more than a pulley and tune seems like a good thing.
Same night I’m assuming.
They ran it twice....first I heard of this. I heard they ran hour after hour with half the tracked soaked with vht to get that 9.65 run.
They claimed best power to weight after introduction? Yes this was a mistake, I believe the 675LT had it beat.
To answer your question the demon is a hell of a car and we’re lucky dodge made it. While I’m not a fan of the strip set up(I can’t stand the the CJ either) the power torque and speed is there. In saying that I choose a viper to drive first, or the rs7/charger hellcat if I need 4 doors
Not bitching at all. I thought the vid on how they obtained the 9.65 was interesting on top of the drag trim it has to have.You drive a ranger so bitching about a demon not running 9.65 is laughable. The car is an animal and the nit picking is a joke.... and I'm a Ford guy.