one less thing you can file suit for now

Steeltwo

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2003
Messages
1,590
Location
wisCOWsin
i think this is waaay overdue.
article


WASHINGTON — The House of Representatives on Wednesday overwhelmingly approved legislation that would put obesity lawsuits against fast-food companies on a starvation diet.

The "Cheeseburger Bill" — officially called the Personal Responsibility in Food Consumption Act (search) — faces obstacles in the Senate. If it becomes law, it would prevent what it describes as "frivolous lawsuits against the manufacturers, distributors or sellers of food or nonalcoholic beverage products" arising from obesity claims.

Those who overeat should blame themselves, not the fast food industry that employs almost 12 million people and is the nation's second largest employer behind the government, Republicans said.

"We as Americans need to realize that suing your way to better health is not the answer," said House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill. "Trial lawyers need to stop encouraging consumers to blame others for the consequences of their actions just so they can profit from frivolous lawsuits against restaurants."

The measure basically says it's the consumer's problem if his greasy-eating habit adds to his bulk and would protect companies like KFC and Wendy's from fat-related lawsuits. But it wouldn't prevent civil suits stemming from tainted foods or mislabeling.

Coming up for a vote a day after health officials announced that obesity was on the verge of surpassing tobacco as the leading preventable cause of death in the United States, the bill easily passed the House 276 to 139.

However, the Senate has often blocked House-passed measures that would cap legal damages or protect certain industries from lawsuits. The Senate bill is sponsored by Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

"I recognize that obesity is a serious problem in America, but suing the people who produce and sell food is not going to solve this problem," he said. "Americans need to take greater care in what - and how much - they eat."

At a news conference before the vote Wednesday, bill sponsor Rep. Ric Keller (search), R-Fla., said the bill is about "common sense and personal responsibility."

The White House issued a statement backing Keller's bill, saying, "food manufacturers and sellers should not be held liable for injury because of a person's consumption of legal, unadulterated food and a person's weight gain or obesity."

But Democrats called the bill a Republican political ploy aimed at hurting trial lawyers and helping the multibillion-dollar food business.

Democrats argue that most obesity claims have been dismissed in court, anyway.

Last year, for example, a federal judge in New York dismissed two class-action suits blaming McDonald's for making people fat.

"It protects an industry that doesn't need to be protected at this particular point and we're dealing with a problem that doesn't exist," said Rep. James McGovern, D-Mass. "The problem that does exist is that we have an obesity problem in this country."

Professor John Banzhaf (search), who is leading the lawyers arguing for their overweight clients who regularly dine at such establishments, insists the lawsuits aren't frivolous.

"Let me remind you that the smoker suits, the non-smoker suits, the suits by the states against the tobacco industry, all were originally called frivolous," Banzhaf said.

Although personal responsibility is a big factor, said Jennifer Keller of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (search), "people are confused about what eating healthy is."

Although obesity undoubtedly is a huge health problem in America, fast-food companies and some lawmakers say a certain amount of common sense should be applied when people stuff themselves with cheeseburgers and French fries.

"The fact is, it's ridiculous to blame a restaurant for when a person eats too much food," Rep. Pat Toomey (search), R-Penn., told Fox News. "It's a person's own individual decision … we ought to make it clear you can't sue a restaurant for the behavior you're responsible for yourself.

"We have a very abusive class-action lawsuit system in this country," he continued.

Many fast-food restaurants now offer leaner menus but it's up to customers whether they want to partake in a salad or a burger.

Louisiana passed similar state legislation to the bill the House passed Wednesday. Nineteen other state legislatures - Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin - have been considering similar bills, the National Conference of State Legislatures said Wednesday.
 

OCSnk

NowIESnk
Established Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
6,429
Location
OC
:rollseyes Damn, I just started my supersize campaign to get fat and sue Mcdonalds. Guess I could throw that dream down the toilet. :bored:
 

Slo3kgtVtr

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2005
Messages
1,731
Location
Vermont
I wonder how much obesity costs the country? I bet it's more than most people would guess. Some obese people are that way from medical problems, but most develop medical problems because of their weight. Natural selection will take alot of overweight people out of the equation eventually, but it must be expensive as a whole anyway.
 

Joe King

Visual molester
Established Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
575
Location
NY
[employs almost 12 million people and is the nation's second largest employer behind the government]


How about ....."The Bloated Government Reduction Act"????





[But Democrats called the bill a Republican political ploy aimed at hurting trial lawyers]


Surprisingly..... Trial lawyers are a very LARGE contibutor to Democratic candidates... :rollseyes
 

LogiWorld123

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2000
Messages
11,172
Location
OK
Why do we need one more confusing law?


(5) QUALIFIED CIVIL LIABILITY ACTION- (A) Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), the term `qualified civil liability action' means a civil action brought by any person against a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product, or a trade association, for damages, penalties, declaratory judgment, injunctive or declaratory relief, restitution, or other relief arising out of, related to, or resulting in injury or potential injury resulting from a person's consumption of a qualified product and weight gain, obesity, or any health condition that is associated with a person's weight gain or obesity, including an action brought by a person other than the person on whose weight gain, obesity, or health condition the action is based, and any derivative action brought by or on behalf of any person or any representative, spouse, parent, child, or other relative of any person.
 
Last edited:

Worsedog

Resident A**hole
Established Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2003
Messages
888
Location
Central FL
Scoriox said:
Why do we need one more confusing law?


(5) QUALIFIED CIVIL LIABILITY ACTION- (A) Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), the term `qualified civil liability action' means a civil action brought by any person against a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product, or a trade association, for damages, penalties, declaratory judgment, injunctive or declaratory relief, restitution, or other relief arising out of, related to, or resulting in injury or potential injury resulting from a person's consumption of a qualified product and weight gain, obesity, or any health condition that is associated with a person's weight gain or obesity, including an action brought by a person other than the person on whose weight gain, obesity, or health condition the action is based, and any derivative action brought by or on behalf of any person or any representative, spouse, parent, child, or other relative of any person.

Because apparently that one didn't stop the lawyers.

What ever happened to the "good old days" when you took the lumps of your own stupidity and learned something from it??????
 

CobraGirlSVT

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2003
Messages
604
Location
So. Cal.
Scoriox said:
Why do we need one more confusing law?


(5) QUALIFIED CIVIL LIABILITY ACTION- (A) Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), the term `qualified civil liability action' means a civil action brought by any person against a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product, or a trade association, for damages, penalties, declaratory judgment, injunctive or declaratory relief, restitution, or other relief arising out of, related to, or resulting in injury or potential injury resulting from a person's consumption of a qualified product and weight gain, obesity, or any health condition that is associated with a person's weight gain or obesity, including an action brought by a person other than the person on whose weight gain, obesity, or health condition the action is based, and any derivative action brought by or on behalf of any person or any representative, spouse, parent, child, or other relative of any person.

That's really not all that confusing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top