Screw Oj. My first duty station was in Sicily and at lunch we only got one channel. We had to watch the OJ trial for what seemed a damn year. Then it was Blossom and some soap opera called Sunset Beach. FTL!
OMG, that is 7th layer of hell!Screw Oj. My first duty station was in Sicily and at lunch we only got one channel. We had to watch the OJ trial for what seemed a damn year. Then it was Blossom and some soap opera called Sunset Beach. FTL!
Doesnt matter...****in my wife is one thing...driving my cobra or my bassboat is a whole different level of wrong or ****ed up...
Please don’t bring the BS in here. I’m trying to actually have an adult conversation and that’s only gonna take it down to stupid path. Continue to be an adult.
My argument to what you just posted would be it was someone wearing his clothing…. Like you stated earlier, was his son looked into heavily?
For me, it doesn’t make logical sense since it does not seem like it was a well thought out plan, but more fit of rage that would lead to much more mistakes and him having blood on him somewhere… on his physical body.
I’m not saying you’re wrong ( as I said earlier I think he did it) just point out the other side of the argument
Screw Oj. My first duty station was in Sicily and at lunch we only got one channel. We had to watch the OJ trial for what seemed a damn year. Then it was Blossom and some soap opera called Sunset Beach. FTL!
Is Blossom fuggable?
1) yes
2) no
That all depends on what crew you run with.Is Blossom fuggable?
1) yes
2) no
Is that the girl from big bang?Back then..I'd PIIHB.
View attachment 1836430
Doesnt matter...****in my wife is one thing...driving my cobra or my bassboat is a whole different level of wrong or ****ed up...
Nah its in the right place here@03Sssnake
Ahhhh. Someone should take it down. I just saw you posted it in the other thread. You’re the reigning master. Hahaha
He did make a number of mistakes, which were introduced in court, but the nine blacks on the jury weren't having any of it.My argument to what you just posted would be it was someone wearing his clothing…. Like you stated earlier, was his son looked into heavily?
For me, it doesn’t make logical sense since it does not seem like it was a well thought out plan, but more fit of rage that would lead to much more mistakes and him having blood on him somewhere… on his physical body.
I’m not saying you’re wrong ( as I said earlier I think he did it) just point out the other side of the argument
Did you watch any of the trail documentaries? There’s A LOT of compelling evidence to make you wonder how the **** he was acquitted without outside circumstances playing a factorPlease don’t bring the BS in here. I’m trying to actually have an adult conversation and that’s only gonna take it down to stupid path. Continue to be an adult.
My argument to what you just posted would be it was someone wearing his clothing…. Like you stated earlier, was his son looked into heavily?
For me, it doesn’t make logical sense since it does not seem like it was a well thought out plan, but more fit of rage that would lead to much more mistakes and him having blood on him somewhere… on his physical body.
I’m not saying you’re wrong ( as I said earlier I think he did it) just point out the other side of the argument
Didn't only take one? That's how I remembered.Here is one of the jurors admitting they acquitted OJ because he was black :