That is a 30k car tops.
do some lookin around. its a 65 vert, not a super rare car and it doesnt even have the orginal motor.
20k should buy a pristine car
8k is too low. it is worth 20 easy. 32 is too much. if it was a 100% original resoration it might be worth that but there are too many things they have modded/changed. if there is NO signs of ANY rust I might negotiate up to 25 but I think that would be my top dollar.
they want a vert.
i would never drive any 1960's convertible
heck no put that towards a new gt500!! IDK why but i hate those 65s,looks too girly imo,also the worst looking mustang produced,,imo
lol wish I could talk him into something like these.
Ford : Mustang Ford : Mustang | eBay
I'll bite...why?
E
Personally, one of the reasons I am attracted to SVT Cobras is because of how aggressive and menacing they look. I have never been a huge fan of any mustang besides the SVT Cobra - atleast, thats what attracted me to Mustangs in the first place (was the high performance variants). I especially despise the term 'ponycar' and anything related to 'pony' in general. lol
To me, the 1960's Mustangs look too feminine (exception being the fastback models).
They look especially feminine compared to the Camaro and Mopar's.
So to me, a 1965 Mustang Convertible is a High School girl's dream, not mine.
LOL seriously?? Over a 74-77 mustang II?? 65-66 may not carry the muscular edge the 69-70 did but they're the beginning of it all.
I'm with everyone else, clean car but over priced. As far as numbers matching, I believe only the K codes fell in that category and if that were a K code it would be a steal.
Detroit locker doesn't fit the vert theme either. Can't see my mom rolling around in a locker car as a cruiser lol
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2