Metco Lower Advantages

aCiD

New Member
Established Member
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
113
Location
Ontario
What are the advantages of using a Metco lower over the OEM?

Planning on a 3.4 Whipple in the mid-20 psi range. Trying to decide if I need one.
 

Quick Strike

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2003
Messages
2,067
Location
PA
There won't be any with a 3.4L SC. The lower helps smaller blowers turn faster with less slip. The lower allows the upper to remain the same size or slightly smaller and still maintain more surface contact area (and less slip) on the larger upper pulley while turning the blower faster.
 

Digital

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
3,414
Location
Miami, FL
There won't be any with a 3.4L SC. The lower helps smaller blowers turn faster with less slip. The lower allows the upper to remain the same size or slightly smaller and still maintain more surface contact area (and less slip) on the larger upper pulley while turning the blower faster.

Pretty much this. It's only effective at maintaining a larger upper blower pulley so you can keep belt slip down and run more boost.

Also on a side note are we competing for longer text sig quick strike?
 

SlowSVT

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
8,272
Location
Los Angeles
The "disadvantage" is the loss of the pulley support where the #1 main bearing is now taking up the side loads imposed by the blower and all the accessories that go along with it.
 

aCiD

New Member
Established Member
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
113
Location
Ontario
OK, that's what I thought guys but I just wanted to confirm.

Thanks a lot!

So ideally I would be bolting a stock caged pulley on to an Innovator West balancer? If so I will do that.
 

Jroc

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Messages
7,900
Location
SC
I thought a aftermarket lower was suppose to generally make better torque PSI for PSI compared to an upper change. :shrug:

I do a agree that the lose of the support bracket is a negative. If you do go the aftermarket lower route don't get too aggressive with using a overly tight belt setup.
 

aCiD

New Member
Established Member
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
113
Location
Ontario
I won't use the lower Metco system based on the feedback and logic here. The blower is capable of generating the air volume I need while still having a reasonably sized pulley on it. I don't want to run the blower very hard.

There's also a possibility I could be going 4L as well, so I will need the extra support on the lower.
 

Quick Strike

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2003
Messages
2,067
Location
PA
So ideally I would be bolting a stock caged pulley on to an Innovator West balancer? If so I will do that.


Just make sure to get the dampner that is made for the stock pulley cage. They have many that fit the 4.6 and 5.4. Some are for non-SC engines, some are for the stock cage and some are for the Metco rings.
 

Swervedriver

Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2003
Messages
878
Location
NC
There have been issues with big torque from big blowers actually tightening the center bolt pulling the crank and ruining the thrust bearing and even cracking blocks. So if you stick with the stock lower, weld that center bolt so it can't get spun.

That won't be an issue with the metco setup but then there is nothing supporting the crank snout.
 

aCiD

New Member
Established Member
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
113
Location
Ontario
Just make sure to get the dampner that is made for the stock pulley cage. They have many that fit the 4.6 and 5.4. Some are for non-SC engines, some are for the stock cage and some are for the Metco rings.

Yea, I've been looking at the proper IW one, thanks!
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top