Vaginal rejuvenation is the new lasik.
After having it hindsite will be 20/10 boyos.
After having it hindsite will be 20/10 boyos.
Vaginal rejuvenation is the new lasik.
After having it hindsite will be 20/10 boyos.
If she’ll need bifocals soon she has the same questions I did. By having lasik to see at distance her eyes will not be able to focus up close to read.I had PRK done back in 2004. One of the best things I ever did. Now the wife is thinking about Lasik since the doctor said she might need bifocals soon.
If she’ll need bifocals soon she has the same questions I did. By having lasik to see at distance her eyes will not be able to focus up close to read.
If this is the case after lasik she will need reading glasses right after lasik or in a few years. I came across multiple ophthalmologist that say based on this lasik is not worth as she would still need glasses.
I could not read with my perscription glasses and had to take them off to read. With lasik however you simply can’t remove it.
My question became, glasses outside and in a few years bifocals or lasik and wearing reading glasses indoors to read. I chose the lasik.
With that decision in order help me read longer the doctor only did 90% correction in my non dominant eye. After surgery I currently have 20/20 and I can still read.
Something I found that I mentioned above:
“The question asked is very appropriate and resonates with me very well. I had Laser Vision Correction performed in 1995, when I was 38. As an Ophthalmologist, knowing full well what happens to our ability to read in our 40's, I opted for my dominant right eye to be treated 100%(giving me 20/20 distance vision) and my left eye to be treated 95%(giving me 20/30 distance vision). I am now 55 years old and I am still enjoying relative reading glass independence. So, for me, it was a great choice. I don't feel I sacrificed(then or now) any distance quality or depth perception. Obviously, as a surgeon, my depth perception is crucial. While in my 40's, I did not need reading glasses at all, but decided to get a pair of over the counter reading glasses a few years ago to make reading at night a little easier. I still don't wear readers in the office or out socially, but in low light I now need some help. Interestingly, since the advent of Kindles and iPads, I find that when I am struggling at all, I can just change the font size and keep on going! So, I am a big advocate of addressing reading where it's appropriate. I would discuss it with your surgeon, though, and ask them to demonstrate the result with a contact lens trial to make sure you can tolerate the difference in the two eyes.”
This is why I haven't gotten Lasik surgery. My Ophthalmologist recommended against it, too. I would love to have 20/20 and not wear any glasses, even for reading, but unfortunately that can't be the case. So I'm resigned to wearing bifocals (lineless).If she’ll need bifocals soon she has the same questions I did. By having lasik to see at distance her eyes will not be able to focus up close to read.
If this is the case after lasik she will need reading glasses right after lasik or in a few years. I came across multiple ophthalmologist that say based on this lasik is not worth as she would still need glasses.
I could not read with my perscription glasses and had to take them off to read. With lasik however you simply can’t remove it.
My question became, glasses outside and in a few years bifocals or lasik and wearing reading glasses indoors to read. I chose the lasik.
With that decision in order help me read longer the doctor only did 90% correction in my non dominant eye. After surgery I currently have 20/20 and I can still read.
Something I found that I mentioned above:
“The question asked is very appropriate and resonates with me very well. I had Laser Vision Correction performed in 1995, when I was 38. As an Ophthalmologist, knowing full well what happens to our ability to read in our 40's, I opted for my dominant right eye to be treated 100%(giving me 20/20 distance vision) and my left eye to be treated 95%(giving me 20/30 distance vision). I am now 55 years old and I am still enjoying relative reading glass independence. So, for me, it was a great choice. I don't feel I sacrificed(then or now) any distance quality or depth perception. Obviously, as a surgeon, my depth perception is crucial. While in my 40's, I did not need reading glasses at all, but decided to get a pair of over the counter reading glasses a few years ago to make reading at night a little easier. I still don't wear readers in the office or out socially, but in low light I now need some help. Interestingly, since the advent of Kindles and iPads, I find that when I am struggling at all, I can just change the font size and keep on going! So, I am a big advocate of addressing reading where it's appropriate. I would discuss it with your surgeon, though, and ask them to demonstrate the result with a contact lens trial to make sure you can tolerate the difference in the two eyes.”
Bob, that’s the question I asked here before my surgery. Seeing how many older people(over 40) have had lasik and how did it work and effect their near vision. With the positive response I went ahead with the surgery.This is why I haven't gotten Lasik surgery. My Ophthalmologist recommended against it, too. I would love to have 20/20 and not wear any glasses, even for reading, but unfortunately that can't be the case. So I'm resigned to wearing bifocals (lineless).
@4stang6, I'm glad it worked out well for you. That's awesome! Enjoy your perfect eyesight with no glasses!