GT350 on the dyno!!!

[black92]

Not bad: http://wot.motortrend.com/hear-the-shelby-gt350s-flat-plane-crank-v-8-on-the-dyno.html

At over 100° F and 20% humidity.... 467HP and 379lb-ft at the wheels.



Difference in power between GT350 and GT350R
http://wot.motortrend.com/does-the-shelby-gt350r-make-more-power-than-the-regular-gt350-wvideo.html

GT350: 467hp
GT350R: 471hp



From this test, GT350 runs 12.4 @ 117.8mph and GT350R runs 12.1 @ 119.6 mph

 

[westwest888]

Dynojet reads very high. Mustang dyno has a lot more truth to it. It would put down about 435 WHP, which is nothing to sneeze at.

 

[DSG2003SVT]

It's probably more like 100°F.

The numbers look good!

 

[bpmurr]

Camaro6 boys already proclaiming the 16 Camaro SS will be faster in the 1/4 mile. :nonono:

http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=426372

 

[black92]

It's probably more like 100°F.

The numbers look good!

Whoops! Fixed :beer:

 

[az20115.0]

this engine desperately needs a variable length runner intake manifold!!! please please someone make one for this car!

 

[AustinSN]

I like the video, car sounds bad ass.

 

[EditorTurner]

You guys are fast...

http://wp.me/p4Z7cO-5Td

 

[Voltwings]

Dynojet reads very high. Mustang dyno has a lot more truth to it. It would put down about 435 WHP, which is nothing to sneeze at.

Not necessarily. If you take 467/526 that comes out to right about 12% drivetrain loss, which is very believable. Your 435 puts it closer to 18%, which is getting into AWD territory.

 

[JD03Cobra]

Camaro6 boys already proclaiming the 16 Camaro SS will be faster in the 1/4 mile. :nonono:

http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=426372

Probably be damn close.

 

[DSG2003SVT]

It also depends on the dyno calibration. Sometimes, mustang dynos can read similarly to a DJ. They need to strap a Z28 down to that dyno right before or after the GT350 so that we can compare.

 

[ScreaminRedZ]

Those new GT350's are fantastic looking cars, great power!

Dynojet reads very high. Mustang dyno has a lot more truth to it. It would put down about 435 WHP, which is nothing to sneeze at.

You can make a Mustang Dyno read whatever you want.

 

[krt22]

You can make a Mustang Dyno read whatever you want.

Agreed, but a lot of the local norcal MDs seem to read much lower than the dynojets, so im guessing that was the basis for the comment.

I think they are closer however when it comes to 2WD cars vs AWD ones

 

[ScreaminRedZ]

Agreed, but a lot of the local norcal MDs seem to read much lower than the dynojets, so im guessing that was the basis for the comment.

I think they are closer however when it comes to 2WD cars vs AWD ones

The ones around here are all over the place.

 

[Tob]

Wow, a bit gutless at low rpm...

 

[DSG2003SVT]

Wow, a bit gutless at low rpm...

I bet that can be corrected with some careful VCT tuning. The 5.0 gains a ton of midrange and low end when the VCT is optimized.

 

[Helmet]

I bet that can be corrected with some careful VCT tuning. The 5.0 gains a ton of midrange and low end when the VCT is optimized.

And a decent set of tri-y headers

 

[DSG2003SVT]

And a decent set of tri-y headers

Well, yeah, but a tune is way easier. Haha!

Headers, no cats, eliminating any exhaust bottlenecks if there are any after the cats, and a good tune, and I bet this thing would be a monster.

 

[Helmet]

Camaro6 boys already proclaiming the 16 Camaro SS will be faster in the 1/4 mile. :nonono:

http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=426372

Just one poster though, The rest seem to be impressed with the numbers

 

[Helmet]

Didn't see anything stating what Octane fuel they used