You can't see the Rockies from Goodland, KS or anywhere from Kansas really.Laugh if you want. I don't mind. I said I'm not an advocate for either. Just observations.
You'd have to get pretty high up to see them.
You can't see the Rockies from Goodland, KS or anywhere from Kansas really.Laugh if you want. I don't mind. I said I'm not an advocate for either. Just observations.
LOL.??? You say not an advocate for either. I say 100% inconclusive. I think you'll find if you read the comments again that I'm you biggest (and only) supporter.
You owe me an apology. But now that you have hurt my feelings I don't want it. And you will not be getting an invite for dinner. So don't ask.
That's 175 miles. I bet it's tough to see anything that far.You can't see the Rockies from Goodland, KS or anywhere from Kansas really.
You'd have to get pretty high up to see them.
Only one conclusion...........he smokes some of the best shit on earth.
What do you mean valid? I'm not lying about it. It's an interesting theory that there are flat spots on a ball. I'm not sure if it could be correct or not. If so, a corresponding spot on the ball would have to have more curvature than the average. Right?
What do you mean valid? I'm not lying about it. It's an interesting theory that there are flat spots on a ball. I'm not sure if it could be correct or not. If so, a corresponding spot on the ball would have to have more curvature than the average. Right?
How far away is the moon?That's 175 miles. I bet it's tough to see anything that far.
I meant seeing 175 miles through the atmosphere at ground level would be hard.How far away is the moon?
I love a good conspiracy theory, but I also love poking holes in them faster than a fat kid at the brownie buffet.
It would be interesting to see exactly how far away you can start to see the Rockies from eastern CO. Do you do that drive often? It would also be interesting how you first saw them. If it was the tip top of Mt Evans in Denver first or if you'd see the entire mountain. On a globe, you'd see the tip top but I'd bet you a nickel that's not how you would see them.You can see that far on a clear day, but you'll need to be in a plane. The furthest proven sight line is 443km (Spanish Pyrenees to French Alps), which apparently uses light refraction to get it that far as the curvature still gets in the way. But that's from a very tall peak, to a very tall peak. You aren't going to see the majority of the earth in between.
It would be interesting to see exactly how far away you can start to see the Rockies from eastern CO. Do you do that drive often? It would also be interesting how you first saw them. If it was the tip top of Mt Evans in Denver first or if you'd see the entire mountain. On a globe, you'd see the tip top but I'd bet you a nickel that's not how you would see them.
Are ya gonna poke holes in my examples? One guy says light refracts over a mile. Do you buy that?
I mean, the principle applies to both the mountains and the ocean. The reason why it's easier to see the effects of the curvature of the earth is water, especially calm water, may only have a few feet of elevation change. On land, the elevation changes quite a bit.I get it. What I was saying is that you don't see the tip top of the mountains from say 100 miles away and then the middle of it from 50 and the bottom from 20. It doesn't grow from 0 feet to 4000 feet.
Apples to Oranges in this instance but OK.Sure, considering the night sky is only visible due to refraction. Once you get above the atmosphere, the only light that gets to your eyes is straight from the source rather than millions of vectors from refraction...
Through the curved windows in the plane? Hmmm.All you have to do is fly in a damn plane to see that earth is round. It is truly amazing some people genuinely believe the earth is flat.
Through the curved windows in the plane? Hmmm.
How do you explain the horizon rising up to meet your eye? Why doesn't the horizon in front drop off, too?