no thanks, if it were the same price as a gt500 i'd still take the mustang. Seriously, unless you are a really good driver would you be able to push the car to the little bit of handling difference? I think the average driver would be able to get through the track faster in a gt500.
There's no doubt it's badass, but like the article states you would have to specifically want THAT car. Being over 3800lbs and not having a/c, sounds deadening and other comforts is a failure in my eyes. If this was 10 years ago it would be the American king, lucky for us there just happen to be better options right now.
It's a failure? Lol....it's made for a somewhat elite buyer....to have as a toy/track car. We aren't talking abôut a DD that someone would buy to commute 75 miles a day in shirt and tie.
My point was why is it still over 3800lbs if it's a "toy/track" car.
My point was why is it still over 3800lbs if it's a "toy/track" car.
read it again slower maybe? It's easier to accelerate than it is to get a car through a turn at the very edge of it's limits which is where you need to be to take advantage of that car. An average driver can make better use of acceleration than they can handling.lol, wut?
It's a failure? Lol....it's made for a somewhat elite buyer....to have as a toy/track car. We aren't talking abôut a DD that someone would buy to commute 75 miles a day in shirt and tie.
i think it looks sick. after reading the review seems like its a flat track monster. $75,000 is a bit much compared to the Boss 302 but i guess the carbon ceramic brakes and carbon splitters are needed.
Wonder what Ford vehicle is comparable? Boss 302 or Boss 302LS?
Agreed$80k For a 3800lb track car???
No thanks!
GM are freakin delusional these days.