Kevins89notch said:I would kill for a clean teal 93 Cobra for 7K.
Just got mine with 69,000 miles ultra clean black interior and great exterior for 9200.00! :rockon:
Kevins89notch said:I would kill for a clean teal 93 Cobra for 7K.
CGoeschel said:Im going to call Ford and find out how many were built with no options. Mine seems to have no options on it. I would think that would make it more rare as most were built with at least some options. Do you know what options were offered? On a side note I think I found the person that originally ordered the car from Gaudin Ford in Las Vegas. He was the PDI tech at the dealership at the time. Now he works at a local speed shop and recognized the car. He said the one he ordered had no options. When I told him the history of the car he was almost certain that my car was the one he ordered back in '93.
BADBOYSPACK said:Mine too has no options on it and was bought at the same dealer as your car was.
The options that were offered were,rear window defroster,sunroof,power seat,block heater,leather seats,CD player.
Thats all I can think of off the top of my head.
Wow our cars are basically the same car with only 4 cars built between ours.
19COBRA93 said:I agree, I'll always choose a cobra over any other body/model. Not even in the same league IMO. I like clean LX's a lot, but hands down, cobra.
OldSkoolMC said:A fox is a fox. Most mustangs are modified. No difference between them.
If someone wants to keep one all stock and mint with no miles it might bring in some money years down the road... But just as the clone Chevelle "SS" cars are out there... they bring in damn good money right now if it is done nice. Why? because the body is the same.
A true numbers matching stock Chevelle SS will bring in more money but only to a collector. Same will go for the Cobra's. My Current 90 GT is worth more money than my 97 Cobra. Why? Because it's mint, low mileage, and built right with good performance parts front to back and reason #1 higher demand for Fox Bodies
:-D
Kabuki_notch said:I bought my Cobra as a roller for 4k, I couldnt at the time afford a complete cobra and I have the most fun with my cars while I am working on them so I bought it and dont regret it at all.
93 sssSVT said:I Agree, that Most cars will bring more $$$ unmolested with low miles, thats a no Brainer. What I don't get is MOD for MOD a mint 90's GT, LX or Notch is Getting the same Coin as a Mint 93 Cobra Modded, that was more money brand new from the Factory. Is 1 of 4993, not 1 of 300,000 like the others.
Thats Like saying a Modded 03 GT is worth as much as a Modded 03 Cobra... I dont think so.
I'm not trying to get anybody fired up, But Bone stock or not a Limited Production Cobra of any sort SHOULD be worth more then its other Mustang Siblings of the same years... IMO :shrug:
93 sssSVT said:Looks Damn Good too :rockon:
~Ray~ said:I paid $13k for my 6k mile Teal, I paid 12k for my 11k mile Black & I paid $7.5k for my 40k mile Red one. I've owned alot more 93 Cobras over the last 13 years & got alot better deals but these three are my personal own & were 100% & mint when I bought em.
OldSkoolMC said:It's all relative in the end. The value of these cars will be determined by the buyers out there who are willing to pay a price.
:beer:
93 sssSVT said:I'm still seeing a Modified Fox GT,LX etc with say 50k on it getting the same price as a Modified 93 Cobra with 50K on it... (same condition,Mods,etc) Thats what I'm comparing.
19COBRA93 said:Are you seeing asking prices similar, or selling prices similar? Because I'm willing to bet these are different.
I was looking to buy a clean fox, or '93 cobra. I found numerous very clean fox's for around $6k some even less. Some modded, some stock. All of them original paint cars (#1 important factor for me). I then found numerous '93 cobras in the same condition, miles, etc and they were atleast $4k higher. I was more interested in the cobras even though they were that much higher in price, so that's the route I'd go.
I paid $10k for my '93 cobra, and if I had paid $10k for an original fox, it had better have next to no miles and be damn near perfect.
My buddy sold his fox for $11K and it had 45k on it, was supercharged with a built motor, TKO500, built rearend, suspension, perfect interior and paint, etc.
Anyway, from the car shopping I've done in the last month or so, there is atleast a $4,000 difference between a like/kind/quality fox, and cobra. And I'm talking '93's. Older fox's bring a bigger gap.
19COBRA93 said:Are you seeing asking prices similar, or selling prices similar? Because I'm willing to bet these are different.
That's kind of my point. Who cares about asking prices. It's the selling prices that dictate value.93 sssSVT said:Check Corral.net
19COBRA93 said:That's kind of my point. Who cares about asking prices. It's the selling prices that dictate value.
LEE93COBRA said:its also relative to the area you live in as well. Down here in the southeast, I have seen plenty of fox lx/gt's go high (above 7k) regardless of year model (well 87-93 years) I have not seen a $4k price difference between them. Then again, there is not enough performance difference in a cobra and a GT to warrant a big price difference. That's why I do not believe our cars will ever be the Shelby's or Bosses of their era. Sure their will be some fools to pay $20k for them but not the whole market of interested buyers
19COBRA93 said:There is a select few fox's I think will always bring top dollar..... '92-93 Strawberry/black coupes, '90-93 black/black coupes, some '92-93 metalic paint/black coupes/hatches, and '93 cobras. But in like/kind/quality, the cobras will always bring more money by atleast a couple thousand, maybe more.