Re: "Let me enlighten you..."
So how does that justify your threat of physical violence? Additionally I never called you a terrorist. If that is what you gathered from my statement you are incorrect.
You posted plenty of data! Most of it flawed. That does not make it fact regardless of my interpretation.
I didnt joke about terrorism or terrorist. If you truly consider Ted Kazinski a terrorist, your definition of a terrorist is skewed from the accepted definition. That definition being "the systematic use of terror as a means of coercion." Ted is a schizophrenic that has delusions and is not causing terror, as the masses were never even concerned as they knew they wouldnt be a target.
I never made light of Ted Kazinski or his actions or those of any Militia except to make the accurate comparison between your diatribe/manifesto and theirs. It was blatantly obvious and just beared pointing out the similarities.
As for me selling donuts or American flags, that isnt the case. As for your quote "Someone really on the "front lines" would have more respect for fellow Americans and never make light of terrorism or terrorists--he/she certainly wouldn't randomly point fingers at people he/she doesn't agree with."
Really what world do you live in? I have respect for those that earn and deserve respect. Just because you are a fellow American doesnt garner immediate respect. I have no respect for any of the American actors protesting this action. They havent earned it and dont deserve it.
I am a Series 1811/12 with an Agency under DOJ. Look it up and then spew more crap.
You are probably right about Chat Room protocol, since I dont go to Chat Rooms I wouldnt know. But since this isnt a Chat Room and the intelligence level in here is much higher than that, you do need to cite sources that are relevant and accurate. The folks in here are looking anddo want factual data not just crap that you received in an email and reposted to assertain your brilliance. That type of crap would work in a Chat Room and if that is your level, maybe it is best you continue posting in Chat Rooms where your drivel, innuendo and supposition will go unchallenged.
I am glad you can see your data and facts are flawed. As for Saddams Bio/Chem weapons not being practical for use on American Soil, you are sadly informed. There are many dispersion methods that will work very well in this Country. Will they cause thousands to be killed at one time, probably not. But hundreds most definitely.
Tom Ridge, the Director of Dept of Homeland Security noted a Weapon of Mass Destruction can indeed be a Bio/Chem weapon that has the potential to cause harm or death to large groups of people with a single incident.
I agree that France does deserve credit for a lot of different things in todays modern culture, but they deserve no credit for anything to do with the Military or Protecting the freedoms of this world, let alone themselves. They ensured that we would receive no formal help in this action by outright stating there is no reason for a UN Security Council Resolution for War against Iraq and that would receive their VETO regardless of the facts.
So how does that justify your threat of physical violence? Additionally I never called you a terrorist. If that is what you gathered from my statement you are incorrect.
You posted plenty of data! Most of it flawed. That does not make it fact regardless of my interpretation.
I didnt joke about terrorism or terrorist. If you truly consider Ted Kazinski a terrorist, your definition of a terrorist is skewed from the accepted definition. That definition being "the systematic use of terror as a means of coercion." Ted is a schizophrenic that has delusions and is not causing terror, as the masses were never even concerned as they knew they wouldnt be a target.
I never made light of Ted Kazinski or his actions or those of any Militia except to make the accurate comparison between your diatribe/manifesto and theirs. It was blatantly obvious and just beared pointing out the similarities.
As for me selling donuts or American flags, that isnt the case. As for your quote "Someone really on the "front lines" would have more respect for fellow Americans and never make light of terrorism or terrorists--he/she certainly wouldn't randomly point fingers at people he/she doesn't agree with."
Really what world do you live in? I have respect for those that earn and deserve respect. Just because you are a fellow American doesnt garner immediate respect. I have no respect for any of the American actors protesting this action. They havent earned it and dont deserve it.
I am a Series 1811/12 with an Agency under DOJ. Look it up and then spew more crap.
You are probably right about Chat Room protocol, since I dont go to Chat Rooms I wouldnt know. But since this isnt a Chat Room and the intelligence level in here is much higher than that, you do need to cite sources that are relevant and accurate. The folks in here are looking anddo want factual data not just crap that you received in an email and reposted to assertain your brilliance. That type of crap would work in a Chat Room and if that is your level, maybe it is best you continue posting in Chat Rooms where your drivel, innuendo and supposition will go unchallenged.
I am glad you can see your data and facts are flawed. As for Saddams Bio/Chem weapons not being practical for use on American Soil, you are sadly informed. There are many dispersion methods that will work very well in this Country. Will they cause thousands to be killed at one time, probably not. But hundreds most definitely.
Tom Ridge, the Director of Dept of Homeland Security noted a Weapon of Mass Destruction can indeed be a Bio/Chem weapon that has the potential to cause harm or death to large groups of people with a single incident.
I agree that France does deserve credit for a lot of different things in todays modern culture, but they deserve no credit for anything to do with the Military or Protecting the freedoms of this world, let alone themselves. They ensured that we would receive no formal help in this action by outright stating there is no reason for a UN Security Council Resolution for War against Iraq and that would receive their VETO regardless of the facts.
