Damn and I thought I was bad about people's grammar and spelling. ;-)
Originally posted by Blackgeetee
Did you see the son of a bitch hold his ****ing baby over the balcony? That's ****ed up! I could care less what others think, I think he's totally ****ed in the head. He should have lost his kid right there.
Originally posted by Sailing2Smth
I think that whole entire deal where he was holding his baby over the balcony was just for to get some pictures taken from the crowd that was screaming for him below.
I mean come on...this is Michael Jackson we're talking about, the guy would not even hurt a fly let alone his own flesh and blood. That whole thing was blown out of porportion, lets be realisitic, he wouldn't do anything to put anyone in harms way.
On from that issue, how about everyone just worry about yourself and leave Mike alone, I am quite certain that you guys have other (better) things that you can do.
OK i dont care a lick for him and i did not watch the show but for a min or 2. I just have one question, did he bleach his kids too? His kids are awful white for a black man. Again just something that my twisted mind noticed, and maybe im just mistaken about the kids.
I should've expected this. TTAFB_SVT, I've read a dozens of your posts; you obviously enjoy--nay, thrive--on insulting the intelligence of people who don't agree with you. Clearly, you exhibit the behavior of an individual attempting to compensate for perceived intellectual shortcomings (that, or you're just an egotistical a-hole with something to prove).
First, it's near impossible to take your lecturing on pedophiles seriously considering you sport the avatar and title of "Butcher of Hanover", he himself a serial murderer and child molester. Despicable.
Go ahead and dismiss the testimony of the thirteen-year-old boy who described in NAUSEATING detail the misconduct of Michael Jackson. Ignore the multi-million dollar settlement Mr. Jackson reached with the boy's family. Believe Mr. Jackson's asinine explanation that he "just didn't want to deal with it."
PS As someone who enjoys picking through posts for spelling and usage errors, I was astounded by this sentence: "Your open-mindedness on this man has been eternally ruined by a life of reading tabloids in the grocery aisle."
"Open-mindedness"? The word "opinion" makes more sense. Agreed? "Eternally ruined"? How dramatic. Save this inflated gem-of-a-phrase for more appropriate situations. Example: "The suicide of his spouse eternally ruined his once sunny disposition." "Reading tabloids in the grocery aisle"? Again, wordiness. "Supermarket tabloids" would have sufficed
Later douche
However, he's F_U_C_K_E_D up! That's my opinion and it's not changing. Don't tell me I'm misinformed etc. I was not born yesterday. I believe what I believe. That's my opinion. You can believe what you want. That's cool. But don't patronize my intelligence and say that my opinions are based on the National Enquirer.
Damn and I thought I was bad about people's grammar and spelling.
Originally posted by FordSVTFan
Yes it was indeed a publicity stunt. But you dont use your helpless, defenseless newborn to garner public attention. That is morally and ethically wrong.
He may not hurt a fly intentionally or maybe he would, you and I dont know this person. But there is a reason they are called accidents. Otherwise they would be called premeditated crimes. Lets not down play his actions. He did indeed do something to put his own newborn in harms way. He had one arm under the child(not tethered) and hung him over a balcony that was at least 30 feet from the concrete below. That is called putting your child at risk. The risk being he could lose his grip and the child could fall to his death. It was stupid and not thought out.
Actually as a society we have the obligation to protect the children and those not capable of protecting themselves. If not us then who? He is a showman trying to regain his lost popularity and misusing his children to create a show. If Micheal doesnt like the criticism, he should not be a public figure and he should not expose his children to his public displays of stupidity.
Please. Pedophiles in the Catholic Church abused hundreds of children for decades, using high-price payoffs to keep them quiet. You don't think Michael has done the same thing?he has had contact with thousands of children yet has had only one child claim misconduct
Originally posted by Sailing2Smth
ya know something, i cannot disagree w/ anything that u said. Your exactly right, but......... i will tell you that ur not perfect! Nor any of you. All of you have done your dirt, none of you are goddamn saints, so what the F_U_C_K gives you the right to judge the act of others, yea mike is ****ed up in the head, yea he has had a ****ed up childhood, yea other people can recover if you are mentally strong enough, he needs help, we have established that, yea he is a good (multi-millionare) sp? musician and is indeed in the public eye, all you can do is criticize, why not just WORRY ABOUT YOURSELVES??
Like i said before, I don't disagree with anything you said, yea it was ****ed up what he did, I don't condone that shit, my point is WHO GIVES A SHIT, WORRY ABOUT YOURSELF AND IMMEDIATE PROBLEMS OF YOUR LIFE. how you like them apples??????????
I'll address your writing first. True, there weren't any spelling errors in the sentence I dissected; you missed the point. It's your writing STYLE that I was critiquing. I was doing the job Microsoft Word can't do.
Your posts is some of the most flatulent prose I've ever encountered.
Being WORDY may have impressed your high school English teachers but it doesn't impress--or intimidate--me
Dumb down your posts? Too many syllables? I can handle anything you can dish out in the English language.
Now, I'll move on to your avatar. You dismissed my criticism as trivial--hardly. Do you like serial murderers? Do you idolize child molesters? What monster can we expect to see next? Hitler? Manson?
Skin lightening (described as "skin bleaching" in earlier posts) isn't a fabricated dermatological procedure. Click here if you don't believe me. You attribute Mr. Jackson's present appearance to vitiligo. Here are genuine vitiligo victims--you're kidding yourself if you think that makeup could disguise the condition.
Please. Pedophiles in the Catholic Church abused hundreds of children for decades, using high-price payoffs to keep them quiet. You don't think Michael has done the same thing?
This is my last post regarding Mr. Jackson. If seeing 12-year-old Gavin put his head on Mr. Jackson's shoulder (while holding his hand) during their documentary interview didn't make you want to vomit, I see no point in arguing further.
Later creep.
Originally posted by TTAFB_SVT
And for the record,Michael had the CFS called on him by more than one person after the balcony incident. They investigated. No hard proof for taking his children away. So it's ok to stop acting like he is a malicious baby tosser of some sort.
Originally posted by FordSVTFan
Larry you've completely lost it!!
Please provide proof that DYFS or Children and Family Services investigated Micheal Jackson about this incident.
Additionally, he is a irresponsible parent. There is no reason or possible explanation for placing his child in harms way by dangling him over a balcony! Just none. Please explain to me how there was no potential harm in that stupid action.
If you are at all serious about this post as well as your other posts in defense of Micheal Jackson's actions you have some severe issues that need to be treated.
If a non star did what he did to that child, captured on video, they would be held on child endangerment charges. That is a fact. He is just lucky it didnt occur in the US.