well, we will see what happens. keep in mind vettes have been around since the '50's. sure, some of them sucked during the 80's, but what car didn't?
vipers lasted 15 years and sold a fraction of the volume when compared to corvettes. sure, the last vipers to roll off the line were quite a bit better than the first decade of cars. but anyone who's driven any viper but the last version will tell you that the car drives like a 'kit car'--its hot, uncomfortable, crude, and rough around the edges. anyone who's driven a viper hard has spun it out at freeway speeds. if they deny it then:
A--they're lying
B--they haven't driven the car hard.
the title is gm's to lose. i would argue that it is DODGE that had better bring their A-game to dethrone the king. don't think i'll be trading in my z-06 on a new viper any time soon---we'll see, i keep an open mind when it comes to cars.
I own a Viper and my Father had had four. They don't drive like a kit car. Maybe the gen I's. The rest I will agree with you on, which gives it that unique personality. Also, that kit car quality could take way more of a beating than the glass jaw drivelines GM likes to put in their vettes.
The Vette has always been a high volume sports car for the masses, while the Viper a more niche type of car for the few. They never tried to sell as many as the vette. The two cars really couldn't be any more different.
There is no "title" to gain or lose, so not sure what you mean by that. The Vette really only clearly outperformed it from 06-07.
This next Viper is on a whole new level. SRT has transformed the car, which is 100% hand built from the ground up. The Vette starts the day as a $50K car built on an assembly line.
anyone who's driven a Vette hard has spun it out at freeway speeds. if they deny it then:
A--they're lying
B--they haven't driven the car hard.