Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
World's Fastest Street Supra
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JKD COBRA" data-source="post: 1345209" data-attributes="member: 3822"><p>redfire - yep they did. The reason I left them out, is because even though they ran 9.1's, they are at an altitude of 2700, if I remember correctly. Whatever it was, they always mention how the car would run much faster at a better track. So I didnt want to say "X2C could have ran low 8's if . . .etc"</p><p></p><p>But yes, you are correct, X2C ran very very low 9's at a very high altitude and full weight (I think). I always wondered if they could have hit 8's with a stock motor and their turbo kit. It was about to get real exciting because they took off their T76 turbo and put on a T88, with a new custom intake manifold. . .they claimed they would hit 1000rwhp 'stock' motor, but I always wondered if they swapped out the pistons. . But it doesn't matter because just like strictly performance, the X2C car was up for sale <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JKD COBRA, post: 1345209, member: 3822"] redfire - yep they did. The reason I left them out, is because even though they ran 9.1's, they are at an altitude of 2700, if I remember correctly. Whatever it was, they always mention how the car would run much faster at a better track. So I didnt want to say "X2C could have ran low 8's if . . .etc" But yes, you are correct, X2C ran very very low 9's at a very high altitude and full weight (I think). I always wondered if they could have hit 8's with a stock motor and their turbo kit. It was about to get real exciting because they took off their T76 turbo and put on a T88, with a new custom intake manifold. . .they claimed they would hit 1000rwhp 'stock' motor, but I always wondered if they swapped out the pistons. . But it doesn't matter because just like strictly performance, the X2C car was up for sale :( [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
World's Fastest Street Supra
Top