Which one? I’ve been looking at both of them. I’m looking to buy a Supercharger in April when I Redeploy back home. So I need advice
So any advice or remarks would be appreciated
:beer:
So any advice or remarks would be appreciated
:beer:
Whipple 3.4 Vs. 2.8 Kenne bell
- Thread starter 03_Cobra_Coy
- Start date
One fits under the stock hood and one doesn't???
3.4L does NOT.
You need to specify your GOALS to distinguish what is the best for you. Otherwise flip a coin.
I know. It was meant to be a sarcastic coment.:bored:
i just want something better than my ported eaton money is not the problem here .. if yall have any other supercharger please let me know?
thanks
thanks
twin 62 is that twin turbo?? sorry you gotta break it down army syle ...
3.4 you need to run high boost, kb you do not
Yes, twin 62mm turbo's or twin 67's and keep the blower for low end.
Can you buy teh parts I iz want?
He makes a great point. its what you want to do. As one guy mentioned twin 62's through your eaton(with the stock pulley installed) would get you 800+hp, where as a guy i know with a 2.8 Mammoth on an 03 was making 612, so its your preference. if you really just wanted to pick between the 3.4 and 2.8, 2.8 would be my preference. but personally im looking into 62's. "Pick the Red or Blue one"
hope this helps
2.9 Whipple !
that does sound good i like to kno more about it
can't see the picture
Its of a 2.8L Liquid Cooled Mammoth KB.
I say Whipple but not on a stock 03 Cobra motor. Or Get a 2.9 Whipple..... :rockon:
i just dont know urghhhh i want power but i aint trying to blow up my motor either ....
03_Cobra_Coy between the two blowers you are contemplating on purchasing, I'd go with the 2.8 Kenne Bell. With the KB you wouldn't have to cut your hood for it to fit or lower the engine in the cars K-member like you would with the Whipple. You can always run the 2.8 at moderate boost levels (16-18 psi) and then turn it up later on down the road if you choose.
Just my two cents.
Just my two cents.
Users who are viewing this thread
