Which of these two is faster? :shrug: Ford GT or the New C6 Z06?......leanin more towards the GT.... GT to me :thumbsup:
Which is faster GT or C6 Z06?
- Thread starter SpeedKillz
- Start date
What the hell else is he gonna do?
IMO both are great, but -- stock vs. stock -- this mag-racer's money's on the GT.
Which is better? If I'm paying, make it a Z06. Otherwise, a GT with a new pulley sounds about right.
Which is better? If I'm paying, make it a Z06. Otherwise, a GT with a new pulley sounds about right.
The GTs are awesome. Did you know you can finance one of them for 10 years because it is considered a super car.
PoisonSnake
Banned
Drivers race.
+1virpacalis said:
Does anyone know any real world, owner driven, GT times? I haven't seen any, just mag times, which I don't trust (ringers, etc.). I've seen 11.6@126 posted from a C6 Z06 owner. GT's are badass tho, saw one drive through the Hooter's parking lot when I was out in Fresno, just cruising at 5mph it was wicked. And with a pulley and tune I'm sure they'd be insane. But the Z06 also has potential, they've already put down just a hair under 500 at the wheels with just a set of longtubes and removing the air filter (no intakes available yet) and that was without a tune (also no software available yet). For the money, Z06 all day long, but if you can swing a GT, why not :beer:
Faster- without question the GT. The Z06 will stop before 200. The GT will go well past. I use fast to describe the speed a car can ultimately achieve.
Quicker- drivers race. Both will go mid-11's@mid-120's.
Quicker- drivers race. Both will go mid-11's@mid-120's.
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2002
- Messages
- 9,444
96 GT is clearly teh winnar
Is the GT in your sig yours? Have you taken it to the track? Just curious for some real world numbers. Badass collection you've got there :thumbsup:DBK said:
bad360rt said:
Nah, sadly it's Fords. A member at the GT site I run ran an 11.8@124 on a 2.1 60ft. He did almost 98mph in the 1/8th, though, so it's pretty clear the car is good for mid-low 11's at 126+. Even with the same trap, getting a 1.9 60 should net an ~11.5 off that time.
Not to shabby for a crappy short time. I'd love to see both cars on a sticky tire :rockon:DBK said:
I read that the guys in MM&FF ran an [email protected] just remember that they switched the tires to a smaller ones...cant remember if they did something else....and also MT ran an 11.20 Bone Stock @130+ when comparing it with the Enzo and Carrera GT
That's why I don't trust magazines, owner trapped 124, mags are trapping 130+, that's a pretty big difference, I smell a ringerRollingOnChrome said:
oke:
Where's the Kill? :wf:
Off to Road Side
Off to Road Side
bad360rt said:That's why I don't trust magazines, owner trapped 124, mags are trapping 130+, that's a pretty big difference, I smell a ringer
Well, to be fair, that 130mph car was a particular owners car, hehe. It was pushing a bit more boost though. You can add plenty of rwhp with just a smaller pulley and short belt without a tune. Add in an air filter and you've got your 130mph barely turning a wrench...
Ok, that makes a lil more sense. I'd love to see one pushing more boost with a tune. I think we'll see the Z06's pulling 130+ with a lil work as well, probably a lil more wrench turning than a pulley swap, but hell they picked up 40 horses with a set of longtubes, can't wait to see what a cam and tune will add. I tell ya, these are some fun times we're living in, gotta love it! :thumbsup:DBK said:
Users who are viewing this thread
