Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2012-2013 Boss 302 Mustang
Whats next for more N/A power?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Highway Star" data-source="post: 12410583" data-attributes="member: 138035"><p>Black n decker, I have not ever seen until you posted the above dyno sheet a performance cam on these cars that did not give up some low end. Now the dyno sheet you refer to is on another engine, so I do not know the applicability to ours, but if someone makes a cam like that I would be interested. The thing to note however is that even the Boss loses some low and midrange torque in comparison to the GT. So whatever the problem, apparently Ford has not fixed it. If you do a complete build, headers, cams, intake, ported heads, torque over the entire power band will increase in comparison to stock. If you do cams and intake only, then yes you wil lose some low end torque. But from my perspective and driving experience this torque loss does not effect ultimate performance and driving enjoyment. Others like to have their neck snap back when they touch the throttle. I on the other hand, enjoy the torque building over the entire RPM band. Isn't that what the concept of the Boss is all about? I wish I could easily post my dyno sheets. Cause I think it would be good information for everybody to have. I did about ten dyno runs on this car and the info really should be out there for everybody else. As to high compression, for the track F@#$ yeah, but e85 is not readily available and I do like to drive the car. I do not know why I cannot just scan my sheets and post them. If anybody could give me some help on this, I would appreciate it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Highway Star, post: 12410583, member: 138035"] Black n decker, I have not ever seen until you posted the above dyno sheet a performance cam on these cars that did not give up some low end. Now the dyno sheet you refer to is on another engine, so I do not know the applicability to ours, but if someone makes a cam like that I would be interested. The thing to note however is that even the Boss loses some low and midrange torque in comparison to the GT. So whatever the problem, apparently Ford has not fixed it. If you do a complete build, headers, cams, intake, ported heads, torque over the entire power band will increase in comparison to stock. If you do cams and intake only, then yes you wil lose some low end torque. But from my perspective and driving experience this torque loss does not effect ultimate performance and driving enjoyment. Others like to have their neck snap back when they touch the throttle. I on the other hand, enjoy the torque building over the entire RPM band. Isn't that what the concept of the Boss is all about? I wish I could easily post my dyno sheets. Cause I think it would be good information for everybody to have. I did about ten dyno runs on this car and the info really should be out there for everybody else. As to high compression, for the track F@#$ yeah, but e85 is not readily available and I do like to drive the car. I do not know why I cannot just scan my sheets and post them. If anybody could give me some help on this, I would appreciate it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2012-2013 Boss 302 Mustang
Whats next for more N/A power?
Top