Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
The Terminator
Engine/Tuning
Universal Dual Pass HE Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="raym5_0" data-source="post: 12369601" data-attributes="member: 94902"><p>Just curious if you noticed a difference....any change in the efficiency of the KC with decreased capacity on yours? also any difference in IAT2's from the whipple to the TVS? :shrug:</p><p></p><p>the reason I ask, with my KC setup I saw lower temps at the end of a WOT run 1st-4th with the increased capacity of coolant.....I use to see a spike of near 110-115*, now I see a spike of around maybe 105 post run....granted it does take the system longer to recover to pre-run temps with more coolant to cool back down. I would estimate my setup may take a couple extra minutes at most.. </p><p></p><p>many recommend the OEM H/E or deletion totaly for better efficiency, but IMO a bypass valve negates some of this loss by not passing the coolant that is chilled to the H/E seeing ambient temps higher than the fluid. </p><p>I wont delete the H/E just for the reason, if I have a AC failure, IAT2's are not going to go through the roof.</p><p></p><p></p><p>w/o the AC, my IAT2's go from low to mid 80's* to high 120's without even beating on it, I know this observation isnt accurate for real IAT2's unless your at WOT, but none the less 40* difference is substantial....:beer:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I appoligize OP for off topic post..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="raym5_0, post: 12369601, member: 94902"] Just curious if you noticed a difference....any change in the efficiency of the KC with decreased capacity on yours? also any difference in IAT2's from the whipple to the TVS? :shrug: the reason I ask, with my KC setup I saw lower temps at the end of a WOT run 1st-4th with the increased capacity of coolant.....I use to see a spike of near 110-115*, now I see a spike of around maybe 105 post run....granted it does take the system longer to recover to pre-run temps with more coolant to cool back down. I would estimate my setup may take a couple extra minutes at most.. many recommend the OEM H/E or deletion totaly for better efficiency, but IMO a bypass valve negates some of this loss by not passing the coolant that is chilled to the H/E seeing ambient temps higher than the fluid. I wont delete the H/E just for the reason, if I have a AC failure, IAT2's are not going to go through the roof. w/o the AC, my IAT2's go from low to mid 80's* to high 120's without even beating on it, I know this observation isnt accurate for real IAT2's unless your at WOT, but none the less 40* difference is substantial....:beer: I appoligize OP for off topic post.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
The Terminator
Engine/Tuning
Universal Dual Pass HE Install
Top