Tune only: +42 rwhp/47 ft lbs.

doctorv8

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 3, 2004
Messages
59
Location
TX
Thanks to Torrie at Unleashed Tuning for a great job. Hard to believe how much power these things make without any hardware changes.

Sanjay13GT500-Torrie-Tune.jpg
 
Last edited:

Chris!

Former Ford Dealer
Established Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
7,692
Location
Boston MA
Before everyone says "that car reads low"

Remember EVERY dyno reads different.

Its the Delta that matters.
 

5.0 guy

Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
801
Location
COLORADO
I was jus going to say tht it seemed low but the increase is awesome! What is the most accurate type dyno?
 

paluka21

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2004
Messages
2,599
Location
Maryland
Question; what changed with the tuning? Increased timing, adjusting fuel tables? A/F ratio looks good, but I noticed when a lot of people get their cars tuned/dyno'ed they do not request a print out of per-RPM based A/F ratio. A tuner should be able to provide this upon request. I always like to see what my A/F ratio is like at peak torque, especially in the upper RPM's.
Congrats on the gains.
 

paluka21

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2004
Messages
2,599
Location
Maryland
I was jus going to say tht it seemed low but the increase is awesome! What is the most accurate type dyno?

Load based dyno's. A lot people go for the DynoJet's because they look pretty but they are inertia only which shows higher hp/tq numbers. They seem to be the norm and industry standard. Superflow, Mustang, Dyno Dyamics and other load based dyno's can yield more real world results based on eddy-current, and will typically be "heart breakers" because if calibrated correctly, they will show numbers a bit lower. For tuning I personally like the eddy-current dyno's as opposed to Dynojets.
Either way, dyno's numbers are just that; dyno numbers.
 
Last edited:

5.0 guy

Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
801
Location
COLORADO
Load based dyno's. A lot people go for the DynoJet's because they look pretty but they are inertia only which shows higher hp/tq numbers. They seem to be the norm and industry standard. Superflow, Mustang, Dyno Dyamics and other load based dyno's can yield more real world results based on eddy-current, and will typically be "heart breakers" because if calibrated correctly, they will show numbers a bit lower. For tuning I personally like the eddy-current dyno's as opposed to Dynojets.
Either way, dyno's numbers are just that; dyno numbers.

Thanks
 

Devious_Snake

PSR Major!
Established Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
9,980
Location
Hell
Only problem with mustang dyno's or loaded dyno's is the added stress on the car when doing the dyno run.

Good pick up with the tune.
 

Derek@Lethal

Authorized Vendor
Authorized Vendor
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
826
Location
Florida
Only problem with mustang dyno's or loaded dyno's is the added stress on the car when doing the dyno run.

Good pick up with the tune.

If that's the case, then we probably shouldn't be driving our cars as that's nearly a 2 ton load being pushed down the road :beer:

Nice increase OP, I bet it's an animal now. :rolling:
 

Ninjak

Posting from The Shadow's
Established Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
2,666
Location
Miami
If that's the case, then we probably shouldn't be driving our cars as that's nearly a 2 ton load being pushed down the road :beer:

Nice increase OP, I bet it's an animal now. :rolling:

Agreed.

Nice numbers. Now change something so you can be part of the met too crowd :lol1:
 

paluka21

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2004
Messages
2,599
Location
Maryland
Only problem with mustang dyno's or loaded dyno's is the added stress on the car when doing the dyno run.

Good pick up with the tune.

IMO you would want the added stress on the car to simulate real world resistance. Would you rather find you have a detonation problem on the dyno, or when you're on the street or track?
 

biminiLX

never stock
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2003
Messages
13,284
Location
Toledo, OH
The most pressing change is to get some DR's.

Yes sir!
I'll add in gears, but you probably already knew that :)
See the 11.03 thread I made, tune, gears, tires and you have a rocket.
I have a John Lund mail-order tune and he told me he gained 33rwhp tune only on his '14 and he flashed same tune to mine.
-J
:beer:
 

1320 Junkie

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
7,675
Location
CT
Load based dyno's. A lot people go for the DynoJet's because they look pretty but they are inertia only which shows higher hp/tq numbers. They seem to be the norm and industry standard. Superflow, Mustang, Dyno Dyamics and other load based dyno's can yield more real world results based on eddy-current, and will typically be "heart breakers" because if calibrated correctly, they will show numbers a bit lower. For tuning I personally like the eddy-current dyno's as opposed to Dynojets.
Either way, dyno's numbers are just that; dyno numbers.


Couldn't agree more!!!!

Op great gains...time for the track!!
 

Eagle24

bad mamba jamba
Established Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
1,365
Location
Clarksville TN
Nice, I have the Lund mail ordered tune. My car went from 587/573 to 637/617 its crazy how held back they are from the factory.
 

doctorv8

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 3, 2004
Messages
59
Location
TX
I had a set of 305/35 20 MT ET streets installed Fri.....wow.....what a difference! Took me back to 15 years ago when I first put Nitto 555R's on my bimini blue notchback.....good memories.....
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top