Holy moly!
Sent from my iPhone using svtperformance.com
Sent from my iPhone using svtperformance.com
New F8 hauls, and Mclaren....really?
IMO most lambos underperform in the straight line metric.
Porsche is the best value in this category of cars. The fact that we're comparing the Turbo S to the F8 and 720S just proves that, as both those cars are $60k-$100k more than the Porsche. The apples to apples would be the GT2 RS, which the F8 doesn't hold a stick to. The 720S and GT2 RS are extremely close the in the 1/4, but the GT2 RS whips the McLaren pretty good on a road course, for the same/similar MSRP. Not to mention with the Porsche you get known reliability, arguably the best interior in this class of cars, and the best dealer access. The McLaren's also tend to depreciate like a mofo and have questionable dealer practices/reliability, whereas as the GT2 RS actually appears to be appreciating.
McLaren has less history so they rely on their performance figures to stay relevant sometimes at the expense of reliability/dealership woes(although maybe this has gotten better?), Ferrari relies less on performance figures and milks their name for all it's worth, and Porsche gives you the most efficient, well rounded car for the price category, and in most cases beating the performance of the cars priced the same.
I agree on buy what you can afford. There's endless levels of that spectrum. Why stop at a McLaren right? Just get the latest Koenigsegg.I'm guessing you haven't been around supercars much at all . Most exotic owners want exotic looking car with good exhaust / engine sound and great performance .
While the Turbo S is cool and fast , it looks and sounds like a beetle with body kit parked next to Lambo , Ferrari , McLaren etc. Buy what you like and what you can afford , if you aren't a brand whore choices are endless . I would really have a hard time spending $230K on a car that looks the same as my neighbors $30K 16 year old Carrera and sounds the same as my other neighbor's Minivan
I guess 9.7-9.8 @143-146mph vs 10.3-10.4 @134-136mph is extremely close to you
No comments , that just shows how much you know about carsThe R35 is literally a Nissan Altima 2 door with 350z sound...
"I would really have a hard time spending $230K on a car that looks the same as my neighbors $30K 16 year old Carrera and sounds the same as my other neighbor's Minivan"No comments , that just shows how much you know about cars
I bet 99% of population [ average Joe] can't tell the difference between $30K 15 year Carrera and 2021 $230K Carrera"I would really have a hard time spending $230K on a car that looks the same as my neighbors $30K 16 year old Carrera and sounds the same as my other neighbor's Minivan"
And that comment proved you know so much about cars?
But sure, ignore every other line I posted, I guess it all made too much sense?
Also I made it pretty clear the real comparison is the GT2 RS vs. the 720... and yes, their 1/4 times are extremely close
That just shows how little they know about cars then. Those people probably can't tell the difference between a 10 year old Lambo and a new one either.I bet 99% of population [ average Joe] can't tell the difference between $30K 15 year Carrera and 2021 $230K Carrera
Tune , full exhaust GT2RS on R compound CUP2R tires and weight reduction vs stock 720S on regular Pirelli tires
So why is that blue one trapping what a stock one should?
2019 Porsche 911 GT2 RS Review, Pricing, and Specs
2018 Porsche 911 GT2 RS Weissach Edition First Test: Record Breaker
Those are 2 sources stating 139mph+ for a stock GT2 RS. Something isn't right with that blue one, especially being modded. Or the sources are straight up lying. Either way, the McLaren has the top end for sure, but that doesn't seem to be enough to overcome the GT2 RS on road courses, as it sets better times. If the GT2 RS actually runs what the sources above say, then my point stands, but if it's the norm to trap 134 stock then that is a big gap yes.
Damn, well good to know if one of these rolls up on me in the GT500 it'll actually be kind of close...Maybe the magazine test cars weren't the same as production models .
GT2Rs is a bad ass track car but it sucks for regular street use, suspension is pretty harsh on GT2RS while 720S rides like a Cadillac in comfort mode . if you look at the times on Laguna Seca for 720S 1:29.7 . I'd say it did pretty well being on regular Pirelli P zero tires 245 front and 305 rear , pretty much all the quickest tested cars were on R compound road race tiresThe Porsche's modest yet still aggressive looks, with their heritage and motorsport success/ongoing participation, and road course performance is what stands out to me. It's also obviously more geared towards road course success with the aggressive aero, and track focused tires. Whereas the 720S is more of a top end car with less aero, and more streetable tires at the sacrifice of lap times. The Porsche feels more like a racecar that's street legal to me, and that's my preference/bias I suppose.
I think this what kind of makes the car cool, similar to the Demon/Hellcat saga. As Dodge said, If you know, you know.I bet 99% of population [ average Joe] can't tell the difference between $30K 15 year Carrera and 2021 $230K Carrera
And if you don't know, you're about to find out.I think this what kind of makes the car cool, similar to the Demon/Hellcat saga. As Dodge said, If you know, you know.