Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Blower Bistro
Treadstone FMIC vs CX Racing FMIC *results inside*
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="2003GTIZZLE" data-source="post: 11600339" data-attributes="member: 51900"><p>Amongst all the bickering a few noticed the most obvious point....you went from a 3" core to a 4.5" core and were surprised at an increase of flow? Thats like putting in a 75 horse jet and then bumping up to a 150 horse jet in a nitrous kit and wondering why it made more power.</p><p></p><p>Apples to apples would have made more sense if you were trying to prove a point, which Im not sure you were, you just want to make more power which we all do. </p><p></p><p>I do have a 3" CX racing intercoolaide that I have run for 3 seasons, never let me down, car sees 9.1 lbs of boost with a 3.33 pulley on a tired V1. IATs on the dyno were fantastic and as I mentioned the car has never let me down boost always there when I need it no matter what the weather. That cheapo intercooler is enough to let the car run consistent 11.40 flat in the 1/4 with minimal cool down. I really dont think these are a bad product at all, so be fair in comparing them is all I am saying.</p><p></p><p>Love,</p><p></p><p>JTR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="2003GTIZZLE, post: 11600339, member: 51900"] Amongst all the bickering a few noticed the most obvious point....you went from a 3" core to a 4.5" core and were surprised at an increase of flow? Thats like putting in a 75 horse jet and then bumping up to a 150 horse jet in a nitrous kit and wondering why it made more power. Apples to apples would have made more sense if you were trying to prove a point, which Im not sure you were, you just want to make more power which we all do. I do have a 3" CX racing intercoolaide that I have run for 3 seasons, never let me down, car sees 9.1 lbs of boost with a 3.33 pulley on a tired V1. IATs on the dyno were fantastic and as I mentioned the car has never let me down boost always there when I need it no matter what the weather. That cheapo intercooler is enough to let the car run consistent 11.40 flat in the 1/4 with minimal cool down. I really dont think these are a bad product at all, so be fair in comparing them is all I am saying. Love, JTR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Blower Bistro
Treadstone FMIC vs CX Racing FMIC *results inside*
Top