Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2013-14 Shelby GT500
Throttle body breakdown & comparison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RedVenom48" data-source="post: 16010177" data-attributes="member: 166576"><p>Lund tuned here. I have a Whipple oval mono, tuned by Dasan (RIP) when he was at Lund. Falls a little flat out of boost but when that thing hits, hold on!</p><p></p><p>The KB168 looks like its built like a tank, tbh.</p><p></p><p>You could have two identical cars side by side, and they are both a little different. Could be as simple as a set of widebands failing or operating out of spec.</p><p></p><p>Id bet there are more people satisfied with Lund Racing than not. A ton of people are tuned by another vendor here and have great results. I was tuned by them and while it didnt run terrible, I had a hunting idle issue with every revision. 100 octane tune felt flat, and that was with a TVS. Switched to Lund Racing and all that cleared up. Magically. I dont discount the fact that people are having issues with them. No one is perfect and mistakes can happen.</p><p></p><p>Lol, but calling Lund Racing Bama 2.0 is straight ignorant. No tuner is perfect, but Bama is on another level of terrible. Lund's not even close to that. Im not opposed to looking at different companies when I pull my engine next year. Could be Lund, could be JDM, might give a local tuner here in Phoenix a try. But if my statements make me a fanboi, so be it.</p><p></p><p>Remote tunes are pretty darn good, but nothing will beat having a tuner personally with your car on a dyno then make live pulls to dial it in. The element of being right there to feel the car react to changes is invaluable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RedVenom48, post: 16010177, member: 166576"] Lund tuned here. I have a Whipple oval mono, tuned by Dasan (RIP) when he was at Lund. Falls a little flat out of boost but when that thing hits, hold on! The KB168 looks like its built like a tank, tbh. You could have two identical cars side by side, and they are both a little different. Could be as simple as a set of widebands failing or operating out of spec. Id bet there are more people satisfied with Lund Racing than not. A ton of people are tuned by another vendor here and have great results. I was tuned by them and while it didnt run terrible, I had a hunting idle issue with every revision. 100 octane tune felt flat, and that was with a TVS. Switched to Lund Racing and all that cleared up. Magically. I dont discount the fact that people are having issues with them. No one is perfect and mistakes can happen. Lol, but calling Lund Racing Bama 2.0 is straight ignorant. No tuner is perfect, but Bama is on another level of terrible. Lund's not even close to that. Im not opposed to looking at different companies when I pull my engine next year. Could be Lund, could be JDM, might give a local tuner here in Phoenix a try. But if my statements make me a fanboi, so be it. Remote tunes are pretty darn good, but nothing will beat having a tuner personally with your car on a dyno then make live pulls to dial it in. The element of being right there to feel the car react to changes is invaluable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2013-14 Shelby GT500
Throttle body breakdown & comparison
Top