Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2013-14 Shelby GT500
"The ZL1 name should be protected"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ry_Trapp0" data-source="post: 11570419" data-attributes="member: 27761"><p>wow, there is a LOT of bullshit and unsubstantiated conjecture in that article.</p><p>shows pics of the '06 cobra mule with rear brembos, and concludes that they would have been on the production car - we've seen a LOT of stuff on mules that didn't make production(cross drilled rotors on the 'ring mules) if you want to stick with brakes).</p><p>the mustang was supposed to get numerous optional engines including a 7.0l DOHC V8, and both SOHC and DOHC supercharged 4.6l - i don't need to explain how absolutely absurd that is in the first place, but ford didn't even have an engine platform that could support 7.0l back then. and single <em>and</em> DOHC 4.6ls supercharged??? sure...</p><p>multiples of poseur scoops and stripes and silly fanged worms - the shelby has never had any scoops, and the hood vents are obviously absolutely functional. silly fanged worms? he must mean stalwart logos of both shelby and the cobra mustang.</p><p>the intention was to bring the rear suspension into the 21st century - funny, the mustang GT hangs with the $65k BMW M3 in all performance metrics.</p><p>then the claims about the ford GT being an engineering disaster, the MT82 is a failure even though the problems have subsided in the newer models and the vast majority of them have been problem free, etc.</p><p>i find it intriguing that there is apparently no author and comments are closed. i'll get my facts elsewhere.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ry_Trapp0, post: 11570419, member: 27761"] wow, there is a LOT of bullshit and unsubstantiated conjecture in that article. shows pics of the '06 cobra mule with rear brembos, and concludes that they would have been on the production car - we've seen a LOT of stuff on mules that didn't make production(cross drilled rotors on the 'ring mules) if you want to stick with brakes). the mustang was supposed to get numerous optional engines including a 7.0l DOHC V8, and both SOHC and DOHC supercharged 4.6l - i don't need to explain how absolutely absurd that is in the first place, but ford didn't even have an engine platform that could support 7.0l back then. and single [i]and[/i] DOHC 4.6ls supercharged??? sure... multiples of poseur scoops and stripes and silly fanged worms - the shelby has never had any scoops, and the hood vents are obviously absolutely functional. silly fanged worms? he must mean stalwart logos of both shelby and the cobra mustang. the intention was to bring the rear suspension into the 21st century - funny, the mustang GT hangs with the $65k BMW M3 in all performance metrics. then the claims about the ford GT being an engineering disaster, the MT82 is a failure even though the problems have subsided in the newer models and the vast majority of them have been problem free, etc. i find it intriguing that there is apparently no author and comments are closed. i'll get my facts elsewhere. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2013-14 Shelby GT500
"The ZL1 name should be protected"
Top