Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
The HARD TRUTH about EVs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SSSSSSSSSSSSVT" data-source="post: 16945226" data-attributes="member: 191592"><p>Even if the battery lasts 8 years that would mean in a 10 year span that vehicle would use $32,000 (todays prices) in battery (energy). Plus all the kw used in the 10 years cost. There is no way that is cheaper than an ICE vehicle in the same time span. The cheaper or cost efficient argument holds zero water. An EV is not cheaper to own when you factor the battery into the equation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SSSSSSSSSSSSVT, post: 16945226, member: 191592"] Even if the battery lasts 8 years that would mean in a 10 year span that vehicle would use $32,000 (todays prices) in battery (energy). Plus all the kw used in the 10 years cost. There is no way that is cheaper than an ICE vehicle in the same time span. The cheaper or cost efficient argument holds zero water. An EV is not cheaper to own when you factor the battery into the equation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
The HARD TRUTH about EVs
Top