Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Teacher fired for giving 0% to students who didn't turn in homework
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blk04L" data-source="post: 16016150" data-attributes="member: 48574"><p><strong>No Child Left Behind requires <u>all public schools receiving federal funding to administer a statewide <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standardized_test" target="_blank">standardized test</a> annually</u> to all students.</strong> Schools that receive <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_and_Secondary_Education_Act#Title" target="_blank">Title I</a> funding through the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_and_Secondary_Education_Act_of_1965" target="_blank">Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965</a> must make <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adequate_Yearly_Progress" target="_blank">Adequate Yearly Progress</a>(AYP) in test scores (e.g. each year, fifth graders must do better on standardized tests than the previous year's fifth graders).</p><p></p><p>If the school's results are repeatedly poor, then steps are taken to improve the school.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Child_Left_Behind_Act#cite_note-10" target="_blank">[10]</a></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Schools that miss AYP for a second consecutive year are publicly labeled as "In Need of Improvement," and must develop a two-year improvement plan for the subject that the school is not teaching well. <strong>Students have the option to transfer to a better school within the school district, if any exists.</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Missing AYP in the third year forces the school to offer free tutoring and other supplemental education services to students who are struggling.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If a school misses its AYP target for a fourth consecutive year, the school is labelled as requiring "corrective action," which might involve wholesale replacement of staff, introduction of a new curriculum, or extending the amount of time students spend in class.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A fifth year of failure results in planning to restructure the entire school; the plan is implemented if the school unsuccessfully hits its AYP targets for the sixth consecutive year. Common options include closing the school, turning the school into a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_school" target="_blank">charter school</a>, hiring a private company to run the school, or asking the state office of education to run the school directly.</li> </ul><p>I fail to see how this was bad in theory.</p><p></p><p>Now the problem was that teachers began teaching student purely to pass a test instead of actually teaching them.</p><p>The schools were already receiving federal funding(from a bill from 1965), the goal was to make sure the schools improved teaching their students via a test established at the state level. They were receiving federal money, why not ask them to improve the ways they were teaching their students? Or are you fine with schools receiving federal money and not giving two shits about how the students did?</p><p></p><p></p><p>The weak? We are talking about kids that are from 6 years old and up?</p><p> Weak little ****ers, die off already.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blk04L, post: 16016150, member: 48574"] [b]No Child Left Behind requires [U]all public schools receiving federal funding to administer a statewide [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standardized_test']standardized test[/URL] annually[/U] to all students.[/b] Schools that receive [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_and_Secondary_Education_Act#Title']Title I[/URL] funding through the [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_and_Secondary_Education_Act_of_1965']Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965[/URL] must make [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adequate_Yearly_Progress']Adequate Yearly Progress[/URL](AYP) in test scores (e.g. each year, fifth graders must do better on standardized tests than the previous year's fifth graders). If the school's results are repeatedly poor, then steps are taken to improve the school.[URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Child_Left_Behind_Act#cite_note-10'][10][/URL] [LIST] [*]Schools that miss AYP for a second consecutive year are publicly labeled as "In Need of Improvement," and must develop a two-year improvement plan for the subject that the school is not teaching well. [b]Students have the option to transfer to a better school within the school district, if any exists.[/b] [*]Missing AYP in the third year forces the school to offer free tutoring and other supplemental education services to students who are struggling. [*]If a school misses its AYP target for a fourth consecutive year, the school is labelled as requiring "corrective action," which might involve wholesale replacement of staff, introduction of a new curriculum, or extending the amount of time students spend in class. [*]A fifth year of failure results in planning to restructure the entire school; the plan is implemented if the school unsuccessfully hits its AYP targets for the sixth consecutive year. Common options include closing the school, turning the school into a [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_school']charter school[/URL], hiring a private company to run the school, or asking the state office of education to run the school directly. [/LIST] I fail to see how this was bad in theory. Now the problem was that teachers began teaching student purely to pass a test instead of actually teaching them. The schools were already receiving federal funding(from a bill from 1965), the goal was to make sure the schools improved teaching their students via a test established at the state level. They were receiving federal money, why not ask them to improve the ways they were teaching their students? Or are you fine with schools receiving federal money and not giving two shits about how the students did? The weak? We are talking about kids that are from 6 years old and up? Weak little ****ers, die off already. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Teacher fired for giving 0% to students who didn't turn in homework
Top