My wife pulled into Wendy's today & a LEO pulled her over.
He said he pulled her over for making a right on red. Only problem was she made a u-turn. He warned her (verbally) about paying attention to the no-right-on-red and let her go. When she retraced her steps to make sure she hadn't made a right turn on red (and cuz Wendy's didn't give her a straw), she went back to where he was hanging out and said she didn't make a right turn, it was a u-turn. She wanted to make sure he could see people that were making u-turns and not busting them for no-right-on-red. He then told her he "misspoke" about the right-on-red and had actually pulled her over for the u-turn. He said "making a u-turn in a high traffic area was a stoppable offense" to a judge even though it was not marked no u-turn.
Is this true? It's high-traffic, sure, but she had a green arrow and no one was turning right which would have been into her path.
He said he pulled her over for making a right on red. Only problem was she made a u-turn. He warned her (verbally) about paying attention to the no-right-on-red and let her go. When she retraced her steps to make sure she hadn't made a right turn on red (and cuz Wendy's didn't give her a straw), she went back to where he was hanging out and said she didn't make a right turn, it was a u-turn. She wanted to make sure he could see people that were making u-turns and not busting them for no-right-on-red. He then told her he "misspoke" about the right-on-red and had actually pulled her over for the u-turn. He said "making a u-turn in a high traffic area was a stoppable offense" to a judge even though it was not marked no u-turn.
Is this true? It's high-traffic, sure, but she had a green arrow and no one was turning right which would have been into her path.