Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
Stock w/ BAP vs Walbro
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fullboogie" data-source="post: 12518158" data-attributes="member: 23633"><p>You misunderstand the meaning of my post. Most of us are aware of mass air flow, brake specific fuel consumption, injector duty cycle, etc. To the extent we are talking about these concepts, yes, the math can provide you with an answer.</p><p></p><p>What this thread appears to be about, in my opinion, is that the masses are looking for rules of thumb that give a safe margin for FP duty cycle, injector duty cycle, and a/f readings. For example - "you're safe with the bone stock fuel system up to 550 rwhp"; "you should invest in a BAP between 550 and 650 rwhp"; and "anything above 650 you must have a BAP and at least 72lb injectors." </p><p></p><p>I know there are 50 ways to skin a cat, but that's not what I'm getting at. What people are hearing is that Tuner #1 will say "oh, you're fine with just a BAP up to 700 rwhp" and the next Tuner will say "I hate BAP's, so you need to upgrade to 72's and a pair of 300lph pumps". It can be confusing to everyone - that's all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fullboogie, post: 12518158, member: 23633"] You misunderstand the meaning of my post. Most of us are aware of mass air flow, brake specific fuel consumption, injector duty cycle, etc. To the extent we are talking about these concepts, yes, the math can provide you with an answer. What this thread appears to be about, in my opinion, is that the masses are looking for rules of thumb that give a safe margin for FP duty cycle, injector duty cycle, and a/f readings. For example - "you're safe with the bone stock fuel system up to 550 rwhp"; "you should invest in a BAP between 550 and 650 rwhp"; and "anything above 650 you must have a BAP and at least 72lb injectors." I know there are 50 ways to skin a cat, but that's not what I'm getting at. What people are hearing is that Tuner #1 will say "oh, you're fine with just a BAP up to 700 rwhp" and the next Tuner will say "I hate BAP's, so you need to upgrade to 72's and a pair of 300lph pumps". It can be confusing to everyone - that's all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
Stock w/ BAP vs Walbro
Top