Seeking advice for a budget iron block build

RainyP71

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
100
Location
NC
Hello,

Looking for advice to finally put together a short block. I have been acquiring parts for a long time now for an all out Aluminator block build, but figured before I go building a high dollar engine, it would be best to cut my teeth on something more budget friendly to avoid the heartache of destroying much more expensive parts on my first go round if things go awry.

Currently these are the parts I am planning on using. I don't have a hp goal, just looking for a good and reliable NA pump gas 4v setup to build out of a hodge-podge of left over parts I have acquired over the years while gathering parts for a bigger build. Figured id start with the short block. I have multiple sets of heads I could use, but I think I want to go with a set of 99 cobra heads I have laying around with 96-98 intake cams, Mach 1 intake, accufab tb, 47lb/hr ford racing injectors m-9593-lu47

Short block:
03/04 cobra iron block, currently at 20 over with scuffed bores, hoping a 10 thou cleanup will make it usable.
2006 3v STD/STD cast steel crank
Brand new set of CR3Z-6200-B "boss" coyote connecting rods
ATI balancer
ARP main studs
I have both a ford performance high volume OR Melling M360HV I could use.
Ford performance 4v timing kit, I also have TFS billet crank gears and L&M secondary gears.

I need advice on selecting pistons for compression ratio and bearings. I was planning on going with 1-FX 4032 alloy DSS racing pistons because that is the price point I am looking for and I do not plan on needing the benefits of 2618 alloy.

Any guidance would be appreciated, thanks in advance.

Robert
 

01yellercobra

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
21,980
Location
Cali
Is the 3V crank 6 or 8 bolt? If it's 6 bolt add a flywheel to your list of parts. But isn't there something different about the 3V crank from the 2V/4V? Or am I thinking of the Coyote crank?

If you're going for budget skip the forged pistons and go hypereutectic. Aim for 10-10.5 since you're staying N/A. You might be able to do 11:1 and live on pump gas. Plus the hyper pistons tend to be lighter than forged.

These engines don't really need a high volume pump. All it'll do is empty the pan quicker.
 

RainyP71

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
100
Location
NC
6 bolt crank, and I think you are thinking of the coyote crank, there shouldn't be anything different from my understanding.

And you know you may be right about going hypereutectic pistons, that was something that never crossed my mind. All I really am trying to build is a slightly stronger stock motor.
 

01yellercobra

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
21,980
Location
Cali
I believe the cast stuff is a little lighter than the forged stuff too. That might get you a couple extra horsepower.
 

52merc

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2000
Messages
601
Location
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Using the following specs and the DSS 1-FX piston:

Bore Dia.=3.582"
Stroke Length=3.543"
Rod Length=5.933"
Compression Height=1.210"
Piston Bore Clearance=0.005" (approximated)
Top Ring Down Distance=0.300" (approximated)
Head Gasket Bore Dia.=3.622" (OE stock)
Compressed Head Gasket Thickness=0.036" (OE stock)
Combustion Chamber Volume=3.17 in³ [52 cm³]

Displacement=285.6 in³ [4.68 L]

With -4 cc 4V Notch Flat Top CR is 9.88:1
With -12 cc 4V Notch Dish CR is 8.92:1
With -21 cc 4V Notch Dish CR is 8.06:1
 

RainyP71

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
100
Location
NC
Thanks for the calculations! Rather disappointing results as I was hoping to be able to get closer to 10.5.
 

52merc

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2000
Messages
601
Location
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
You would need to go with a piston that is -1 cc or less. There are a few around but may be too costly for what you are trying to do. My calculations are for stock block deck height. Decking the block 0.020" will get you to 10.34:1. There was some variance on combustion chamber size from the factory so the only way to get a good CR number would be to volume check the heads. A combustion chamber volume of 51 cc along with the 0.020" decking would yield 10.5:1.
 

RainyP71

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
100
Location
NC
Seeing as this block is already at 20 over, the deck may have been cut pretty well already. It was a Jasper rebuild so I wouldn't be surprised. I'll get the block over to the shop and have them check it out and I'll start getting things ready to have the heads refreshed then I'll measure the combustion chamber. Thank you for the help!
 

RainyP71

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
100
Location
NC
When it comes to bearing selection and clearances for the crank, what should I be asking the machine shop? Both my block and crank are in good condition on the mains and standard sized currently. Any advice on bearings to use and oil clearance targets?
 

Badaz01

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2020
Messages
656
Location
Pennsylvania
Seeing as this block is already at 20 over, the deck may have been cut pretty well already. It was a Jasper rebuild so I wouldn't be surprised. I'll get the block over to the shop and have them check it out and I'll start getting things ready to have the heads refreshed then I'll measure the combustion chamber. Thank you for the help!
I had Manley flat tops in my 01 cobra that put me at 10:67.1. It was a little to hot even for e85 on 15# of boost. But would probably to good in an na build. I’m currently rebuilding myself for 9:1 compression but mines a whole different animal. Sometimes I wish I kept it simple and stayed na.
 

01yellercobra

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
21,980
Location
Cali
I had Manley flat tops in my 01 cobra that put me at 10:67.1. It was a little to hot even for e85 on 15# of boost. But would probably to good in an na build. I’m currently rebuilding myself for 9:1 compression but mines a whole different animal. Sometimes I wish I kept it simple and stayed na.
Wut? I know of builds that ran 11-12:1 with boost on E85. One of my Cobros here is running a built engine with 11:1 and a Whipple 3.0 at 28 or 29psi. He's close to 900hp. I'm beginning to think your tuner might be your issue.

Op, what about looking for Mach pistons? I don't remember how much difference there is between the chambers in the 99/01 vs 03/04 heads. But the Machs were 10.3:1 from the factory. Well, thereabouts.
 

Badaz01

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2020
Messages
656
Location
Pennsylvania
Wut? I know of builds that ran 11-12:1 with boost on E85. One of my Cobros here is running a built engine with 11:1 and a Whipple 3.0 at 28 or 29psi. He's close to 900hp. I'm beginning to think your tuner might be your issue.

Op, what about looking for Mach pistons? I don't remember how much difference there is between the chambers in the 99/01 vs 03/04 heads. But the Machs were 10.3:1 from the factory. Well, thereabouts.
Yea idk driver side bank ran leaner than the other for some reason. Idk.
 

Blkkbgt

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Messages
3,359
Location
The land of commies and socialists!
When it comes to bearing selection and clearances for the crank, what should I be asking the machine shop? Both my block and crank are in good condition on the mains and standard sized currently. Any advice on bearings to use and oil clearance targets?

You're not building an all out race engine, keep the bearing clearances within the oem spec.

I personally am a fan of King SI bearings. They are considered a stock replacement and they've always measured properly for me.

Make sure you triple check every clearance. If you don't have access to a dial bore gauge buy one especially if you plan on doing this again.

If you use T-gauges or snap gauges and a standard micrometer don't snap them into the bearing, guide them in slowly or you'll dimple your bearings.

For your rods and mains plastigauge is actually a decent final check. I've tested it against a dial bore gauge and it was darn close and showed I was at least within the clearance limits. Just make sure your using the correct one for the dimensions your dealing with.
 

RainyP71

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
100
Location
NC
Great advice, thank you!

Also, I think I decided to just stick with the DSS forgings. Realized I have basically everything needed to do a eaton swap, so they cant hurt. Ill just stay N/A for a while until I put the bracket set and intercooler together.
 

RainyP71

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
100
Location
NC
Thanks for everyones help leading up to this point. I have acquired all parts needed to finish the short block except for rings. Build should have me around 10-10.5:1 compression, staying N/A for now. Running DSS 4032 piston with a 1.5/1.5/3.0 ring pack and need some advice on what rings I should go with. Was thinking about total seals gapless. Anyone have any experience or advice on rings for a N/A application?
 

01yellercobra

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
21,980
Location
Cali
DSS doesn't offer rings with their pistons?

I've ran Total Seal in the past with good luck. I highly recommend skipping the gapless set up. Go with a traditional ring. The gapless can work a little too well. They can pull enough vacuum that they can suck oil past the seals and guides on decel. Learned that one the hard way. And I spoke with someone else that had the same issue. So next time I build a motor it'll get normal style rings.
 

RainyP71

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
100
Location
NC
I elected to buy them ringless to go with whatever has been proven to work well for others. What version of the totalseals have you ran? I've seen your experience repeated a few times over my research on gapless rings and that's unfortunate to hear. I am still somewhat leaning towards wanting to try them, but know if I had that issue id feel like a fool when I would've had minimal issues with a standard ring pack.
 

Blkkbgt

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Messages
3,359
Location
The land of commies and socialists!
I elected to buy them ringless to go with whatever has been proven to work well for others. What version of the totalseals have you ran? I've seen your experience repeated a few times over my research on gapless rings and that's unfortunate to hear. I am still somewhat leaning towards wanting to try them, but know if I had that issue id feel like a fool when I would've had minimal issues with a standard ring pack.
Listen to 01yellercobra, don't do it.

While I like total seal they used to push those rings pretty hard when/if you called them. They've since backed off significantly recommending them for street cars.

That's based on a conversation I had with them years ago though.

Run a conventional ring package and be done with it.
 

RainyP71

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
100
Location
NC
How does total seals advanced profiling ring pack sit with everyone? Im planning on adding some boost in the future.
 

Blkkbgt

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Messages
3,359
Location
The land of commies and socialists!
How does total seals advanced profiling ring pack sit with everyone? Im planning on adding some boost in the future.
It's a great ring for boost. It won't flake like moly can. People have been using them in high HP applications for a long time.

Another option is a Gas Nitrided ring sold by modmax.

The only problem I've had is finding a machine shop that will actually hone the damn cylinders the way the instructions say.

Most machine shops want to argue about it because they don't have the brush hone needed for the final step.

That's at least been my experience in my area.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top