Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Religion vs Science debate: bring it in here
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="1hot281" data-source="post: 13391034" data-attributes="member: 88586"><p>The problem with this line of argument is, it then becomes valid for <em>any</em> claim. </p><p></p><p>We may not be able to show physical proof that dragons are real, but neither can you show that they are <em>not</em> real. </p><p></p><p>We may not be able to show physical proof that Zeus and Thor are real, but neither can you show that they are <em>not</em> real.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="1hot281, post: 13391034, member: 88586"] The problem with this line of argument is, it then becomes valid for [I]any[/I] claim. We may not be able to show physical proof that dragons are real, but neither can you show that they are [I]not[/I] real. We may not be able to show physical proof that Zeus and Thor are real, but neither can you show that they are [I]not[/I] real. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Religion vs Science debate: bring it in here
Top