PonyXpress
New Member
Considering all the damage to homes, buisnesses, and city infastructure, would it be cheaper to rebuild NOLA in situ, or to abandon the city, demolish the dams holding the Mississippi on it's course and begin building a new port city on the Atchafalaya River 50 miles away?
I'm not asking what the politicians WILL do (rebuild in place and have the city flood again in the future), or whether it should be ressurected for sentimental value, just whether it makes more economic sense to relocate.
*Edit: Admins delete one of these threads. Yes, I'm retarded*
I'm not asking what the politicians WILL do (rebuild in place and have the city flood again in the future), or whether it should be ressurected for sentimental value, just whether it makes more economic sense to relocate.
*Edit: Admins delete one of these threads. Yes, I'm retarded*
Last edited by a moderator: