Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Really? This Qualifies For "Stand Your Ground"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shurur" data-source="post: 16275545" data-attributes="member: 113850"><p>I can see it your way too.</p><p></p><p>When the shooter got that adrenaline dump all the subtlety of the pusher's movements went away or were unobserved. And the shooter was only speaking, not being physical.</p><p></p><p>This is why the defense should have had or been allowed an expert witness. I am not sure whether they did have one or not. (I had to go without one as well)</p><p></p><p>There will be an appeal.</p><p></p><p>Michael Drejka is feeling that constant state of fear from the moments before the shooting all the way to now and beyond, and I feel for him. </p><p></p><p>I just dont think he was in a place he had a right to be from the git-go. And a jury has the right to believe any testimony or not, expert or not, all or in part. A jury can decide that the charges are unreasonable and excessive. This is why juries need to be fully informed of their power to nullify, but Jury nullification is a double edged sword as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shurur, post: 16275545, member: 113850"] I can see it your way too. When the shooter got that adrenaline dump all the subtlety of the pusher's movements went away or were unobserved. And the shooter was only speaking, not being physical. This is why the defense should have had or been allowed an expert witness. I am not sure whether they did have one or not. (I had to go without one as well) There will be an appeal. Michael Drejka is feeling that constant state of fear from the moments before the shooting all the way to now and beyond, and I feel for him. I just dont think he was in a place he had a right to be from the git-go. And a jury has the right to believe any testimony or not, expert or not, all or in part. A jury can decide that the charges are unreasonable and excessive. This is why juries need to be fully informed of their power to nullify, but Jury nullification is a double edged sword as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Really? This Qualifies For "Stand Your Ground"
Top