Cant imagine living or growing up in a communist country. How ****ing awful! If u were born in the USA u won the "Birth Lottery".
Hey, that's a start!Nothing new. China has had their muslim minorities in camps for some time and world refuses to admit it.
You proved his point.
You proved his point.
Not a single communist shit hole.
Yep. But I'd hardly call the USA the "big win" of any genetics lottery.
It's more like.. a 1500 scratch off.
Ok context really matters here. What is exactly being measured to produce that list?
I have also traveled to 4 of the countries on that list. I find that pretty hard to believe based on my experience. Not bad by any means, but not flowing with overall greatness compared to the US.
Did you really just throw Wikipedia at us? I thought you were all college educated and wise? Then you should know that is not a legit source...
Did you really just throw Wikipedia at us? I thought you were all college educated and wise? Then you should know that is not a legit source...
Then why even debate?This entire forum is comprised of people who selectively say "Fake News" and quote random obscure websites under the premise they're factual, despite being based out of North Africa.
I really don't give a shit how legitimate my sources are, because on SVTp, legitimate is a moving target.
Ok context really matters here. What is exactly being measured to produce that list?
I have also traveled to 4 of the countries on that list. I find that pretty hard to believe based on my experience. Not bad by any means, but not flowing with overall greatness compared to the US.
Then why even debate?
Is this what you used? Where-to-be-born Index - Wikipedia
Edit: Australia #1?! There is a whole network dedicated to showing us how ****ed up Australia is (The Animal Planet)
Did you really just throw Wikipedia at us? I thought you were all college educated and wise? Then you should know that is not a legit source...
If a wiki article has a legit source...then just use the source. I have not ran into a professor that allows wikipedia as a source, regardless of the quality of the article.Depends on the sources the writer uses on Wikipedia. If they quoted stats/have a decent study for the rankings and have a credible link for it, then it's fine imo.
If it's a chart with no reference to backup the data then yea it could very well be BS.
Since wiki is written/editted by tons of people, it can vary on quality/accuracy of content.