Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Power-Adders
procharger and nitrous?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TexasStang4585" data-source="post: 13287777" data-attributes="member: 142456"><p>I've had my Paxton installed and running e85 for about 2 weeks now....just on the fuel swap I gained 60rwhp and torque throughout the power band. That was with a tune that only had 15* timing on E85. I just got a revision today from my tuner and the car feels even stronger. </p><p></p><p>Anyway if I were in your shoes I'd run e85 because it's a cheaper than FTW and better for you engine like others have said. Here is a dyno comparison of E85 vs 93 done at the same day (95 degrees, Texas weather) only making 7lbs at 6900rpm on conservative tunes. Since then I've had revisions to the E85 tune so I should be making more power with the increased timing. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]486706[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TexasStang4585, post: 13287777, member: 142456"] I've had my Paxton installed and running e85 for about 2 weeks now....just on the fuel swap I gained 60rwhp and torque throughout the power band. That was with a tune that only had 15* timing on E85. I just got a revision today from my tuner and the car feels even stronger. Anyway if I were in your shoes I'd run e85 because it's a cheaper than FTW and better for you engine like others have said. Here is a dyno comparison of E85 vs 93 done at the same day (95 degrees, Texas weather) only making 7lbs at 6900rpm on conservative tunes. Since then I've had revisions to the E85 tune so I should be making more power with the increased timing. [ATTACH=full]486706[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Power-Adders
procharger and nitrous?
Top