Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Power-Adders
Paxton or Vmp Tvs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="beefcake" data-source="post: 13272467" data-attributes="member: 1692"><p>That will be the biggest overpriced piece of junk.</p><p></p><p>Not to mention the ugliest centri ever made</p><p></p><p></p><p>Depends on the SC the Paxton is more efficient than even the stage 2 pro charger when it comes to temps</p><p></p><p>The Paxton is less expensive, more efficient, less crank stress, better cai placement, more power potential </p><p></p><p>And again, the Torque argument is non existent in these cars. It isn't a 2v or 3v, these cars already make plenty of torque. Look at Dyno graphs of stock kits, they are within 15-20 ft lbs of each other. People just keep repeating stuff that simply isn't true. Just because it was true on a 3v doesn't make it true on a coyote.</p><p></p><p>I'll put up a Paxton car against a tvs car any day of the week, especially in hot temps</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="beefcake, post: 13272467, member: 1692"] That will be the biggest overpriced piece of junk. Not to mention the ugliest centri ever made Depends on the SC the Paxton is more efficient than even the stage 2 pro charger when it comes to temps The Paxton is less expensive, more efficient, less crank stress, better cai placement, more power potential And again, the Torque argument is non existent in these cars. It isn't a 2v or 3v, these cars already make plenty of torque. Look at Dyno graphs of stock kits, they are within 15-20 ft lbs of each other. People just keep repeating stuff that simply isn't true. Just because it was true on a 3v doesn't make it true on a coyote. I'll put up a Paxton car against a tvs car any day of the week, especially in hot temps [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Power-Adders
Paxton or Vmp Tvs
Top