Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Power-Adders
Paxton or Procharger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="beefcake" data-source="post: 13341504" data-attributes="member: 1692"><p>The crank stress statement is 100% incorrect. The Paxton uses the OEM tensioner for the belt. The crank has no additional stress at all.</p><p></p><p>The Paxton slaps an extra pulley off of the front of the car with an added tensioner. </p><p></p><p>That is far from no extra crank stress.</p><p></p><p>As far as they have been SL longer? What does that have to do with anything? </p><p></p><p>As far as leading heads up racing, what does that have to do with the Coyote platform?</p><p></p><p>The guy isn't looking to go heads up racing in renegade or outlaw. What matters is how they are performing on this platform. And it's been proven over the last 3 years, the Paxton will outperform the Procharger kit.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Why spend $1500 more for a sub par kit?</p><p></p><p>Higher IAT's, Fact. More Crank Stress. Fact. Less HP Potential. Fact</p><p></p><p>MORE MONEY, FACT.</p><p></p><p>What's better about any of that?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="beefcake, post: 13341504, member: 1692"] The crank stress statement is 100% incorrect. The Paxton uses the OEM tensioner for the belt. The crank has no additional stress at all. The Paxton slaps an extra pulley off of the front of the car with an added tensioner. That is far from no extra crank stress. As far as they have been SL longer? What does that have to do with anything? As far as leading heads up racing, what does that have to do with the Coyote platform? The guy isn't looking to go heads up racing in renegade or outlaw. What matters is how they are performing on this platform. And it's been proven over the last 3 years, the Paxton will outperform the Procharger kit. Why spend $1500 more for a sub par kit? Higher IAT's, Fact. More Crank Stress. Fact. Less HP Potential. Fact MORE MONEY, FACT. What's better about any of that? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Power-Adders
Paxton or Procharger
Top