Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
New Edge Cobras
opinions about the QA1 tubular kmembers...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="97Stangv6" data-source="post: 4115978" data-attributes="member: 22343"><p>No, nothing needs to be reloacated. Although, if you use you stock control arms (which i dont not recomend, even though they say you can). They dont mention how heavy grinding to the control arm around the bushings is required. I will be going coil-over soon. But if you really have to you can use the stock arms so you can retain the springs. </p><p></p><p>NOTE:By using the stock control arms the front end will sit a lot lower then it should because it puts the arms out slitly father the stock. I doubt i'm the only person that has experienced this. I have Ford C spring in the front with MM Poly isolators and i can barley stick two fingers between the tire and fender.</p><p></p><p>The Poly Engine mouts where just something i did when i replaced the k-memeber to stiffen the engine up and my stock mounts where shot. Their is nothing but benifits from them. No side effects like noise or anything.</p><p></p><p>The one thing i love about any tubular k-memebr is how much easier it is to work on the bottom of the engine. Its more then a night and day difference. I would buy one just for the benifit of the added accessability. </p><p></p><p>I think it rides just like stock. But i cant give a real comarisson as i did a swap from a v6 at the same time. So i went from a 4x4 ride with VERY soft srpings to down in the weeds, speed bumping scraping with VERY little travel. I kinda contradicted myself, but it feels how i think it would given the changes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="97Stangv6, post: 4115978, member: 22343"] No, nothing needs to be reloacated. Although, if you use you stock control arms (which i dont not recomend, even though they say you can). They dont mention how heavy grinding to the control arm around the bushings is required. I will be going coil-over soon. But if you really have to you can use the stock arms so you can retain the springs. NOTE:By using the stock control arms the front end will sit a lot lower then it should because it puts the arms out slitly father the stock. I doubt i'm the only person that has experienced this. I have Ford C spring in the front with MM Poly isolators and i can barley stick two fingers between the tire and fender. The Poly Engine mouts where just something i did when i replaced the k-memeber to stiffen the engine up and my stock mounts where shot. Their is nothing but benifits from them. No side effects like noise or anything. The one thing i love about any tubular k-memebr is how much easier it is to work on the bottom of the engine. Its more then a night and day difference. I would buy one just for the benifit of the added accessability. I think it rides just like stock. But i cant give a real comarisson as i did a swap from a v6 at the same time. So i went from a 4x4 ride with VERY soft srpings to down in the weeds, speed bumping scraping with VERY little travel. I kinda contradicted myself, but it feels how i think it would given the changes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
New Edge Cobras
opinions about the QA1 tubular kmembers...
Top