Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
No More Big Bang
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rossim22" data-source="post: 11670793" data-attributes="member: 103156"><p>First of all... you're oblivious. Nobody said gravity doesn't exist... only that we do not know what is so special about a planet being a few miles from me that my whole body is being attracted to it. We do not understand it... not that it doesn't exist.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Now to wurd2...</p><p>What you described (which you did very well) is exactly what I am trying to avoid. What I find absolutely crazy about the current model is:</p><p></p><p>-Everything in the whole universe came from one explosion without creating a completely uniform setting. I think a static universe makes much more logical sense. But then I also would have no idea where matter came from in a static model as well.</p><p></p><p>-Bending space time. This also simply does not make logical sense and appears to be out of a sci-fi book. How can essentially nothing, bend and curve?</p><p></p><p>-Dark matter/dark energy. This only became a theory AFTER scientists measured the rate of rotation of a typical spiral galaxy and found that everything should be flying apart because gravity is so weak. They said "something" must be there and we can't see it so it must not give off... or reflect light. Now all of the stars and planets are only 4% of the universe to keep gravity alive.</p><p></p><p>-Black holes. They seem to constantly contradict themselves as they have been found to emit a stream of light... though light cannot escape it's gravitational force... not to mention the Information Loss problem.</p><p></p><p>-Comets. Comets are said to be huge blocks of ice and their tails are streams of dust and ice illuminated by the sun's solar wind and radiation... however the Deep Impact mission completely turned everything upside down. Comets aren't even smooth and appear to be exactly like asteroids with a different orbit and the electrical model proposed numerous theories at what would happen during the mission and was proved right over and over. Again, they found NO ice!</p><p></p><p></p><p>You are right in now that I "want" it to be right I will ignore those obvious facts of the real world placed right in front of me. However, the current model is what I accepted first, not the electric model.. but it seems to have more contradictions while the plasma cosmology model explain things with rational, common sense answers. We simply would not have magnetic fields anywhere if there was not electricity flowing in space. If there was more evidence that comets are just dirty ice balls from the "kepler" belt and that dark energy has been found and proven since it encompasses about 75% of the universe, I would be a firm big bang believer. :read:</p><p></p><p>Until then, I'm going to believe that the dark energy and matter are just stand-in variables for the force that scientists cannot explain. Not to mention that the red-shift is just a measure of how far away the galaxy is from it's parent galaxy. :rolling:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rossim22, post: 11670793, member: 103156"] First of all... you're oblivious. Nobody said gravity doesn't exist... only that we do not know what is so special about a planet being a few miles from me that my whole body is being attracted to it. We do not understand it... not that it doesn't exist. Now to wurd2... What you described (which you did very well) is exactly what I am trying to avoid. What I find absolutely crazy about the current model is: -Everything in the whole universe came from one explosion without creating a completely uniform setting. I think a static universe makes much more logical sense. But then I also would have no idea where matter came from in a static model as well. -Bending space time. This also simply does not make logical sense and appears to be out of a sci-fi book. How can essentially nothing, bend and curve? -Dark matter/dark energy. This only became a theory AFTER scientists measured the rate of rotation of a typical spiral galaxy and found that everything should be flying apart because gravity is so weak. They said "something" must be there and we can't see it so it must not give off... or reflect light. Now all of the stars and planets are only 4% of the universe to keep gravity alive. -Black holes. They seem to constantly contradict themselves as they have been found to emit a stream of light... though light cannot escape it's gravitational force... not to mention the Information Loss problem. -Comets. Comets are said to be huge blocks of ice and their tails are streams of dust and ice illuminated by the sun's solar wind and radiation... however the Deep Impact mission completely turned everything upside down. Comets aren't even smooth and appear to be exactly like asteroids with a different orbit and the electrical model proposed numerous theories at what would happen during the mission and was proved right over and over. Again, they found NO ice! You are right in now that I "want" it to be right I will ignore those obvious facts of the real world placed right in front of me. However, the current model is what I accepted first, not the electric model.. but it seems to have more contradictions while the plasma cosmology model explain things with rational, common sense answers. We simply would not have magnetic fields anywhere if there was not electricity flowing in space. If there was more evidence that comets are just dirty ice balls from the "kepler" belt and that dark energy has been found and proven since it encompasses about 75% of the universe, I would be a firm big bang believer. :read: Until then, I'm going to believe that the dark energy and matter are just stand-in variables for the force that scientists cannot explain. Not to mention that the red-shift is just a measure of how far away the galaxy is from it's parent galaxy. :rolling: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
No More Big Bang
Top