Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
No More Big Bang
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="1hot281" data-source="post: 11666501" data-attributes="member: 88586"><p>This again... Is it 2001? It doesn't strike anyone as odd that neither of the authors have advanced degrees in <em>Theoretical</em> Physics... or a <em>Masters or PhD</em> in any sort of high end mathmatics?</p><p></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Talbott" target="_blank">David Talbott - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</a></p><p></p><p>Dude has a Bachelors in Education and Political science... and some grad work in Urban Studies... </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.velikovsky.info/Wallace_Thornhill" target="_blank">Wal Thornhill - The Velikovsky Encyclopedia</a></p><p></p><p>Dude got a degree/degrees in physics and electronics in Australia, and never finished post grad studies because of "the lack of curiosity and the frequent hostility toward his challenge to mainstream science convinced Thornhill to pursue an independent path outside academia."</p><p></p><p><a href="http://dealingwithcreationisminastronomy.blogspot.com/p/challenges-for-electric-universe.html" target="_blank">Dealing with Creationism in Astronomy: Challenges for Electric Universe 'Theorists'</a></p><p></p><p><em>^^^"The standard for physical models is that they produce numerical values in agreement with observations from well-understood, more fundamental principles. Yet the Electric Universe (EU) model produces no such values of solar wind or interplanetary magnetic field, values which we can compare to measurements from the many satellites flown from the orbit of Mercury to the heliopause. Why should the Electric Universe model be regarded as superior to the more standard model(s) when the standard models disagree at the few percent level, or at worst factor of a few, while EU <strong>produces no values for comparison</strong> at all?"</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="1hot281, post: 11666501, member: 88586"] This again... Is it 2001? It doesn't strike anyone as odd that neither of the authors have advanced degrees in [I]Theoretical[/I] Physics... or a [I]Masters or PhD[/I] in any sort of high end mathmatics? [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Talbott]David Talbott - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url] Dude has a Bachelors in Education and Political science... and some grad work in Urban Studies... [url=http://www.velikovsky.info/Wallace_Thornhill]Wal Thornhill - The Velikovsky Encyclopedia[/url] Dude got a degree/degrees in physics and electronics in Australia, and never finished post grad studies because of "the lack of curiosity and the frequent hostility toward his challenge to mainstream science convinced Thornhill to pursue an independent path outside academia." [url=http://dealingwithcreationisminastronomy.blogspot.com/p/challenges-for-electric-universe.html]Dealing with Creationism in Astronomy: Challenges for Electric Universe 'Theorists'[/url] [I]^^^"The standard for physical models is that they produce numerical values in agreement with observations from well-understood, more fundamental principles. Yet the Electric Universe (EU) model produces no such values of solar wind or interplanetary magnetic field, values which we can compare to measurements from the many satellites flown from the orbit of Mercury to the heliopause. Why should the Electric Universe model be regarded as superior to the more standard model(s) when the standard models disagree at the few percent level, or at worst factor of a few, while EU [B]produces no values for comparison[/B] at all?"[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
No More Big Bang
Top