Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Greasy Spoon
New study from Amsoil
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="1hot281" data-source="post: 13314475" data-attributes="member: 88586"><p>Jimmy,</p><p></p><p>I think for the most part, people in this thread are in agreement that HPS and XPR are great offerings from Royal Purple. </p><p></p><p>But what say you in regards to Unleashed's info, showing that RP is possibly now selling a Group III hydrocracked conventional "synthetic" as its API-approved line?</p><p></p><p>and while this thread has somewhat devolved into cheerleading/fanboyism and bashing, (which is to be expected in ANY motor oil related thread) I think it's likely that <em>some</em> people that have been swayed away from Royal Purple, <em>not</em> by competitors bashing, or UOA reports and/or bench tests, but by Royal Purple's <em>own</em> lack of transparency when it comes to MSDS and product specification sheets. As Unleashed said, it does appear as if RP has something to hide.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="1hot281, post: 13314475, member: 88586"] Jimmy, I think for the most part, people in this thread are in agreement that HPS and XPR are great offerings from Royal Purple. But what say you in regards to Unleashed's info, showing that RP is possibly now selling a Group III hydrocracked conventional "synthetic" as its API-approved line? and while this thread has somewhat devolved into cheerleading/fanboyism and bashing, (which is to be expected in ANY motor oil related thread) I think it's likely that [I]some[/I] people that have been swayed away from Royal Purple, [I]not[/I] by competitors bashing, or UOA reports and/or bench tests, but by Royal Purple's [I]own[/I] lack of transparency when it comes to MSDS and product specification sheets. As Unleashed said, it does appear as if RP has something to hide. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Greasy Spoon
New study from Amsoil
Top