Why not a 4.6 just for old time sake
Hmmm.
Wonder why the are billing it as fuel efficient.
Wasn’t all the eco hype supposed to do that?
Could this be the answer to corvettes twin turbo small cube mill?
Gt500 with snails and a screamer?
Sent from my POFS iPhone in a rage cause this is the third try.
Because anemia sucksWhy not a 4.6 just for old time sake
When they say power "dense" I think the number will be lower than hoped for. The engine will likely be saddled with every technology available (stop/start) to conserve fuel. Increased complexity, increased cost.
Yuck.
That would be a downgrade.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When they say power "dense" I think the number will be lower than hoped for. The engine will likely be saddled with every technology available (stop/start) to conserve fuel. Increased complexity, increased cost.
Yuck.
Probably displacement limitations in Europe. Notice none of those engines are >= 5.0.