Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Special Interests and Events
Open Track Racing
NASA ST3 - eliminating PTA/TTA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PushinTheLimit" data-source="post: 12250169" data-attributes="member: 44792"><p>I've weighed in on the ST3 class on the other forum... and I hope it helps to get better car counts for ST2 and ST3 both. Eliminating STR1 and STR2 will help since cars like the Panoz can run with those classes again with a points modifier. </p><p></p><p>If there was somehow a merger for GTS classes with ST classes it would help car counts and make for some interesting racing. I agree with you Kevin that ST3 will be more expensive to be competitive than PTA, but some of the trade offs I think will help. Wider tires (better overall for racing), big brakes (initial cost is more, but brake pads are cheaper and last longer), etc. </p><p></p><p>Since it looks like the class will allow cars without aero some assistance, it probably benefits older T1 cars like mine and Tim's more so than some others. Also, a little higher weight/power could bring in more mustangs, STI's, Evo's, Lotus Elise (already one in ST2 that's fast) and some others. Would be better to kill Spec Z so the 350's could run ST3 too.</p><p></p><p>Now once they finish up and determine the class and rules, they need to leave them alone for at least 3 years before making any small adjustments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PushinTheLimit, post: 12250169, member: 44792"] I've weighed in on the ST3 class on the other forum... and I hope it helps to get better car counts for ST2 and ST3 both. Eliminating STR1 and STR2 will help since cars like the Panoz can run with those classes again with a points modifier. If there was somehow a merger for GTS classes with ST classes it would help car counts and make for some interesting racing. I agree with you Kevin that ST3 will be more expensive to be competitive than PTA, but some of the trade offs I think will help. Wider tires (better overall for racing), big brakes (initial cost is more, but brake pads are cheaper and last longer), etc. Since it looks like the class will allow cars without aero some assistance, it probably benefits older T1 cars like mine and Tim's more so than some others. Also, a little higher weight/power could bring in more mustangs, STI's, Evo's, Lotus Elise (already one in ST2 that's fast) and some others. Would be better to kill Spec Z so the 350's could run ST3 too. Now once they finish up and determine the class and rules, they need to leave them alone for at least 3 years before making any small adjustments. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Special Interests and Events
Open Track Racing
NASA ST3 - eliminating PTA/TTA
Top