Not to bad for 6500ft. This run is on a dynojet with the mods in my sig. I was just getting a base line run, so I know what I made with the soon to come Paxton setup.:coolman:
My first dyno run...
- Thread starter Krace
- Start date
Not to bad for 6500ft. This run is on a dynojet with the mods in my sig. I was just getting a base line run, so I know what I made with the soon to come Paxton setup.:coolman:
Not bad at all for 6500ft, should be a beast with the Paxton.
Yeah I'm going for 600rwhp on e85.
Nice, Congrats
I may put the stock manifold, stock TB, and stock air box on. So I can get an idea on what my mods made. What I do know, is that in a 25mph roll race with a stock 5.0. I pull away in the top of 3rd fairly well, but from 1st to the bottom of 3rd its about dead even. I think the big mod i did was the Boss manifold, it just pulls so much harder in the top end.
Last edited:
LOL I know right? We just need to move Colorado to sea level....
Nice numbers , putting my Boss intake on in about a week and a half and ill be headed off to the dyno myself , looking forward to it
If you like to run you car in the higher rpm band a lot. You will love the Boss manifold, 6000-7500 just pulls like a monster.
At 6500 ft. he was putting down 325 hp. Corrected hp is the same anywhere.
Yes I know... I wanted corrected numbers, so once i have my paxton installed i have numbers i can go off of. If it were uncorrected, my hp numbers will be different in a hr of running again. So uncorrected info want help me at all, especially 2-3 months from now when everything is a bit warmer.
So yes, I want to be at 600rwhp corrected at my altitude. :dancenana:
The Paxton is going to wake it up quite a bit, especially at altitude. I bought my car in Colorado. That is also where I installed my Paxton. Made a few over 600 to the wheels SAE on 91.
Nice!
Question, are the 3.73's make it a bit to much? I'm thinking about dropping back down to 3.31.
Users who are viewing this thread
