Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Manslaughter or self-defense??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mobeydick" data-source="post: 16767519" data-attributes="member: 66916"><p>"I’m almost certain had the dad gotten a good hit on the shooter he would have knocked his ass out cold." ~~ Again, might makes right even when you are someone else's property and already been asked and then told to leave!</p><p> </p><p>"I agree had the shooter been indicted it would have been very bad, however, the shooter was not in fear of his life, had he been in fear for his life he would have:" ~~ It's Texas you don't have to be in fear for your life! </p><p></p><p>"A. Retreated into the house and called the police." ~~ He had no obligation/duty to do that!</p><p></p><p>"B. Not have argued and instigated in the first place." ~~ His property and again has no obligation/duty to do that! The dead guy did have a civil obligation/duty to not argue and LEAVE! If he thought the shooter had violated the law, he SHOULD have left and called Law Enforcement! </p><p></p><p>"C. If he did grab a gun, he would have stayed inside and waited for the police. If the dad entered the house it would have obviously been self defense plain and simple." ~~ Again has no obligation/duty to do that! The dead guy was behaving aggressively towards a female that was LAWFULLY invited to his house! </p><p></p><p>"D. Never gotten involved in shit he shouldn’t be involved in, in the first place." ~~ Correct the dead guy should have stayed off the property if he could not be civil in the first place! He was an aggressive hothead [dumbass] and good riddance to dumbasses! </p><p></p><p>"Bottom line is shooter brought the gun out to intimidate the dad. Once that in itself didn’t work, he fired a warning shot to try and scare the dad away, which still didn’t work. Once he started getting man handled he was afraid that dad was going to take his gun (which he introduced into the situation) away from him and shoot him with it, making him afraid for his life. Kinda self inflicted huh." ~~ Bottom line is the dumbass [dead guy] though he could intimidate physically weaker individuals "might make right" instead of bein civil!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mobeydick, post: 16767519, member: 66916"] "I’m almost certain had the dad gotten a good hit on the shooter he would have knocked his ass out cold." ~~ Again, might makes right even when you are someone else's property and already been asked and then told to leave! "I agree had the shooter been indicted it would have been very bad, however, the shooter was not in fear of his life, had he been in fear for his life he would have:" ~~ It's Texas you don't have to be in fear for your life! "A. Retreated into the house and called the police." ~~ He had no obligation/duty to do that! "B. Not have argued and instigated in the first place." ~~ His property and again has no obligation/duty to do that! The dead guy did have a civil obligation/duty to not argue and LEAVE! If he thought the shooter had violated the law, he SHOULD have left and called Law Enforcement! "C. If he did grab a gun, he would have stayed inside and waited for the police. If the dad entered the house it would have obviously been self defense plain and simple." ~~ Again has no obligation/duty to do that! The dead guy was behaving aggressively towards a female that was LAWFULLY invited to his house! "D. Never gotten involved in shit he shouldn’t be involved in, in the first place." ~~ Correct the dead guy should have stayed off the property if he could not be civil in the first place! He was an aggressive hothead [dumbass] and good riddance to dumbasses! "Bottom line is shooter brought the gun out to intimidate the dad. Once that in itself didn’t work, he fired a warning shot to try and scare the dad away, which still didn’t work. Once he started getting man handled he was afraid that dad was going to take his gun (which he introduced into the situation) away from him and shoot him with it, making him afraid for his life. Kinda self inflicted huh." ~~ Bottom line is the dumbass [dead guy] though he could intimidate physically weaker individuals "might make right" instead of bein civil! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Manslaughter or self-defense??
Top