Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Driveline/Suspension
Lets talk wheel hop on a TP car (Roush+55D springs)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BMR Tech" data-source="post: 14323281" data-attributes="member: 124691"><p>The Roush UCA is pretty good, for what it's intended purpose is. </p><p></p><p>Personally, I am very picky about what combinations that I feel comfortable recommending it for.</p><p></p><p>For example, I don't like the lowered UCA mounting point of the Roush UCA on a lowered car. The lowering of the car already does this....so I like LCA Brackets for IC Change.</p><p></p><p>Another thing I do not like, is the fact that they use the 8.5" Length UCA instead of the lengthened 11+ UCA, which is 9.5". An inch really does make a big difference, despite what we all try to convince ourselves of.... lol</p><p></p><p>The longer UCA leads to increased axle stability in every condition. Handling, braking, acceleration, decel, etc.</p><p></p><p>That being said, MY recommendation when a customer calls with a similar request, is to do the BMR UCA Mount in the lower position.....and a set of LCA.</p><p></p><p>You keep the OEM NVH level of the UCA, while using a lowered mounting point on the BMR Mount which helps with traction and wheel hop.</p><p></p><p>Is the OEM UCA better than the Roush, or the BMR? Meh - not really. Can it work well? For many, yes.</p><p></p><p>My vote is:</p><p></p><p>UCM002 ($149.95)</p><p>TCA032 ($89.95)</p><p></p><p>Finally - wheel hop is tricky. Sometimes a complete rear suspension will not cure it 100%....and sometimes only (1) upgrade like LCA, will cure it. I cannot promise, ever, that XXXX will 100% rid of wheel hop, unfortunately.</p><p></p><p>Good luck!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BMR Tech, post: 14323281, member: 124691"] The Roush UCA is pretty good, for what it's intended purpose is. Personally, I am very picky about what combinations that I feel comfortable recommending it for. For example, I don't like the lowered UCA mounting point of the Roush UCA on a lowered car. The lowering of the car already does this....so I like LCA Brackets for IC Change. Another thing I do not like, is the fact that they use the 8.5" Length UCA instead of the lengthened 11+ UCA, which is 9.5". An inch really does make a big difference, despite what we all try to convince ourselves of.... lol The longer UCA leads to increased axle stability in every condition. Handling, braking, acceleration, decel, etc. That being said, MY recommendation when a customer calls with a similar request, is to do the BMR UCA Mount in the lower position.....and a set of LCA. You keep the OEM NVH level of the UCA, while using a lowered mounting point on the BMR Mount which helps with traction and wheel hop. Is the OEM UCA better than the Roush, or the BMR? Meh - not really. Can it work well? For many, yes. My vote is: UCM002 ($149.95) TCA032 ($89.95) Finally - wheel hop is tricky. Sometimes a complete rear suspension will not cure it 100%....and sometimes only (1) upgrade like LCA, will cure it. I cannot promise, ever, that XXXX will 100% rid of wheel hop, unfortunately. Good luck! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Driveline/Suspension
Lets talk wheel hop on a TP car (Roush+55D springs)
Top