My internets being funky and the link won't load. However I'm guessing those are the snap/stick on covers ? I bought the smoked lens set for my Mach which will replace the entire tail light and I will say they look much better than spray on junk and they are just as bright if not brighter than the stockers and yet still have the nice smoked look. I've never been hassled and at night the police would have no idea they are smoked as they are very bright with the lights on and when I brake.
What you will want to check is if the reflective part is still actually reflecting. I understand the lights may be or seem brighter, but part of the laws include the reflectors being visible and reflecting.
Those covers he posted will not allow the reflectors to reflect.
Easiest way to tell is just take a picture with a shitty camera with the flash on.
Only night picture I have. I've been really happy with the quality of these tail lights.
Daytime
Without having time to locate the applicable statue I did find that at night, two rear taillights must be visible from 1000 feet, and two stoplights must engage when the brake is depressed and visible in daylight at 300 feet.
Why would the reflectiveness matter its not like you will be be driving at night with the lights off. I have had those exact tints on my car for 3 yrs now lived in CA and Now Kansas with no problems.
Why would the reflectiveness matter its not like you will be be driving at night with the lights off. I have had those exact tints on my car for 3 yrs now lived in CA and Now Kansas with no problems.
Do you get pulled over every time you drive over the speed limit?
Tinting the taillights blocks the reflectivity. Cars are required to have reflectors. Not sure what's so hard to get about that.
That's like saying you don't have to have your headlights on when the streetlights are on.
This is false. It says nothing about your tail lights having to be reflective, that's nonsense.
"They must also have two red lights visible from a distance of not less than 1,000 feet to the rear, or one red light visible to the rear for a distance of 1,000 feet and two red reflectors visible from all distances from 600 feet to 1,000 feet. "
State of Florida.com - Vehicle Guide
Just needs a red reflector on each side, visible from 1000ft.
This is false. It says nothing about your tail lights having to be reflective, that's nonsense.
"They must also have two red lights visible from a distance of not less than 1,000 feet to the rear, or one red light visible to the rear for a distance of 1,000 feet and two red reflectors visible from all distances from 600 feet to 1,000 feet. "
State of Florida.com - Vehicle Guide
Just needs a red reflector on each side, visible from 1000ft.
Where in your actual quote does is say "on each side"? You just added that in there. Those reflectors aren't visible from the rear are they?
It doesn't. Next time you want to link a website do a couple of things.
First, try to understand what you are actually reading, you can't add your own interpretation.
Second, if you are going to quote motor vehicle laws try going to the actual State's website. Your google-fu needs work.
Ok mr comprehension fail, I'll break it down for you. A vehicle in FL must have TWO red taillights visible from 1k feet OR ONE red taillight AND two reflectors. If you have two red taillights visible from 1k feet, reflectors are not needed.
316.229 Lamps on parked vehicles.—
(1) Every vehicle shall be equipped with one or more lamps which, when lighted, shall display a white or amber light visible from a distance of 1,000 feet to the front of the vehicle and a red light visible from a distance of 1,000 feet to the rear of the vehicle.
why are you still arguing this. it has been stated by a FLORIDA prosecutor that they are not legal in FL. Like a lot of other things there are plenty of people who do it and don't get ticketed but that does not make it legal. Your ramblings don't make it legal either