Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
im so tired of these dam iraqis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="svt32v99" data-source="post: 3719878" data-attributes="member: 33812"><p>*Sigh* eddy, you poor, poor man. Here is where I am going to prove you wrong on every single issue you raised. </p><p></p><p>First off, I did not respond to your bait (images of self grandeur here?), I merely asserted that you are an asshat.</p><p></p><p>Secondly, I never said you were wrong about anything, I said you were an asshat (kindly refer to the above sentence).</p><p></p><p>Thirdly, I clearly stated my side, contrary to what you believe. There is nothing to debate since I stand firm in my convictions as you clearly albeit erroneously do too. (Yes, I am right, you are wrong. See Euphoricone’s post.)</p><p></p><p>Fourth, I never claimed that my opinions changed every minute, everyday or every month. You, like a lawyer, twisted what I didn’t say into what you could use as something to supposedly discredit me. My opinions are the same and it takes a lot to change them. Nothing wrong with being firm in your convictions, I applaud you for that. The difference is that I do not make a habit of typing something just to see what I wrote (spin on the old adage “speak to just hear yourself talk”) every ****ing day. (Please do not point fingers at Taronis, this is about you.)</p><p></p><p>Fifth, no one asked you to change your opinion. I called you an asshat.</p><p></p><p>Sixth, I did not “quote” your post at all (my, my we are egocentric!), I called you an asshat.</p><p></p><p>Seventh, I have never been sued, nor has anyone in my family. I have beef with lawyers that drive up our insurance premiums across the board and the fact that I can’t get a motorcycle jacket with an inflatable air bag in it in the United States because there are “product liability” obstacles to overcome. (<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/04/24/magazines/business2/softeningcrashlanding/index.htm" target="_blank">http://money.cnn.com/2006/04/24/magazines/business2/softeningcrashlanding/index.htm</a>)</p><p></p><p>Eighth, it is my opinion that anyone with enough time or money can be trained to do what you do. I could be a doctor, I could be a mechanic, I could be a lawyer. And so can you. I have no idea if you are a “good” one and I really don’t care, the fact of the matter remains that any monkey can be trained to do what you do. (This is my personal opinion and obviously I am allowing for at least marginal intelligence required to function as a human being.)</p><p></p><p>Ninth, once again, I did not take your “bait.” Nothing about you is irresistible, please stop flattering yourself. I merely called you an asshat. (I find it interesting that you take negative complements as an indicator that people somehow can’t take their minds off of you.)</p><p></p><p>Tenth, attempting moral equivalency in the analogy of peeing near a toilet and missing is “not a good strategy” is clearly a Red Herring argument. It is not logical to equate your pissing analogy to the Iraq war as they are completely unrelated. If you see it as a similar event, then you might need to get your internal chemical balances checked because something has gone awry. BTW, calling the attempt of peeing in a toilet a “strategy” shows that you clearly do not grasp the meaning of strategy; peeing in a toilet is more than likely a part of another strategy, otherwise it is merely an action. Your understanding makes it obvious that you do not view the Iraq war as anything but just a simple event, like we are there for the sake of being there. (To up your ante and abuse your human waste-related analogy, are you suggesting that we are “peeing” in the wrong toilet? Should we be “peeing” in Iran? You know as well as any body on this forum that your answer is to not pee at all, just hold it in and hopefully the feeling will go away.)</p><p></p><p>Eleventh, I never implied you didn’t thank service men for their service; to the contrary, I called you an asshat. </p><p></p><p>Twelfth, quite frankly, I never cared about the Iraqis, though now I do. They may not care about us but I find it much more important to bring the fight somewhere else and Iraq is as good as a location as any in my opinion. </p><p></p><p>Thirteenth, once again you have violated common sense and used a flippant remark to “refute” my opinions. (Some lawyer you are.) “Putting us in Iraq has nothing to do with making or getting us peace. That is no more reality than Snow White and the Seven Dwarves.” Red Herring argument applied twice in the same post. Clearly you do not understand the concept of “long term strategy.” You see things in a very shortsighted view, which is my whole complaint with most detractors of this war and any subsequent events that must follow. </p><p></p><p>End of dissection of flawed eddy thinking.</p><p></p><p>Notes to think about (constructive thoughts): If you understood what bringing peace to the Middle East meant for the long term (next 80-100 years) in regards to our own position worldwide affairs, then you might see what I am saying. </p><p></p><p>Bringing democracy to the Middle East is a step in bringing the entire world to productivity, economically and to lasting peace. This is on a scale that has not been thought of ever. We must think outside of even 5 generations. We are beginning to set into motion a worldwide change that is only matched by this experiment known as The United States of America. But like anything worthwhile, it takes time and it has to happen on a global scale. Quite often, change such as this is painful and arduous. But just because it is unpleasant, it doesn’t mean that it is not worthwhile.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="svt32v99, post: 3719878, member: 33812"] *Sigh* eddy, you poor, poor man. Here is where I am going to prove you wrong on every single issue you raised. First off, I did not respond to your bait (images of self grandeur here?), I merely asserted that you are an asshat. Secondly, I never said you were wrong about anything, I said you were an asshat (kindly refer to the above sentence). Thirdly, I clearly stated my side, contrary to what you believe. There is nothing to debate since I stand firm in my convictions as you clearly albeit erroneously do too. (Yes, I am right, you are wrong. See Euphoricone’s post.) Fourth, I never claimed that my opinions changed every minute, everyday or every month. You, like a lawyer, twisted what I didn’t say into what you could use as something to supposedly discredit me. My opinions are the same and it takes a lot to change them. Nothing wrong with being firm in your convictions, I applaud you for that. The difference is that I do not make a habit of typing something just to see what I wrote (spin on the old adage “speak to just hear yourself talk”) every ****ing day. (Please do not point fingers at Taronis, this is about you.) Fifth, no one asked you to change your opinion. I called you an asshat. Sixth, I did not “quote” your post at all (my, my we are egocentric!), I called you an asshat. Seventh, I have never been sued, nor has anyone in my family. I have beef with lawyers that drive up our insurance premiums across the board and the fact that I can’t get a motorcycle jacket with an inflatable air bag in it in the United States because there are “product liability” obstacles to overcome. ([url]http://money.cnn.com/2006/04/24/magazines/business2/softeningcrashlanding/index.htm[/url]) Eighth, it is my opinion that anyone with enough time or money can be trained to do what you do. I could be a doctor, I could be a mechanic, I could be a lawyer. And so can you. I have no idea if you are a “good” one and I really don’t care, the fact of the matter remains that any monkey can be trained to do what you do. (This is my personal opinion and obviously I am allowing for at least marginal intelligence required to function as a human being.) Ninth, once again, I did not take your “bait.” Nothing about you is irresistible, please stop flattering yourself. I merely called you an asshat. (I find it interesting that you take negative complements as an indicator that people somehow can’t take their minds off of you.) Tenth, attempting moral equivalency in the analogy of peeing near a toilet and missing is “not a good strategy” is clearly a Red Herring argument. It is not logical to equate your pissing analogy to the Iraq war as they are completely unrelated. If you see it as a similar event, then you might need to get your internal chemical balances checked because something has gone awry. BTW, calling the attempt of peeing in a toilet a “strategy” shows that you clearly do not grasp the meaning of strategy; peeing in a toilet is more than likely a part of another strategy, otherwise it is merely an action. Your understanding makes it obvious that you do not view the Iraq war as anything but just a simple event, like we are there for the sake of being there. (To up your ante and abuse your human waste-related analogy, are you suggesting that we are “peeing” in the wrong toilet? Should we be “peeing” in Iran? You know as well as any body on this forum that your answer is to not pee at all, just hold it in and hopefully the feeling will go away.) Eleventh, I never implied you didn’t thank service men for their service; to the contrary, I called you an asshat. Twelfth, quite frankly, I never cared about the Iraqis, though now I do. They may not care about us but I find it much more important to bring the fight somewhere else and Iraq is as good as a location as any in my opinion. Thirteenth, once again you have violated common sense and used a flippant remark to “refute” my opinions. (Some lawyer you are.) “Putting us in Iraq has nothing to do with making or getting us peace. That is no more reality than Snow White and the Seven Dwarves.” Red Herring argument applied twice in the same post. Clearly you do not understand the concept of “long term strategy.” You see things in a very shortsighted view, which is my whole complaint with most detractors of this war and any subsequent events that must follow. End of dissection of flawed eddy thinking. Notes to think about (constructive thoughts): If you understood what bringing peace to the Middle East meant for the long term (next 80-100 years) in regards to our own position worldwide affairs, then you might see what I am saying. Bringing democracy to the Middle East is a step in bringing the entire world to productivity, economically and to lasting peace. This is on a scale that has not been thought of ever. We must think outside of even 5 generations. We are beginning to set into motion a worldwide change that is only matched by this experiment known as The United States of America. But like anything worthwhile, it takes time and it has to happen on a global scale. Quite often, change such as this is painful and arduous. But just because it is unpleasant, it doesn’t mean that it is not worthwhile. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
im so tired of these dam iraqis
Top