Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
I am in a really bad situation.....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FordSVTFan" data-source="post: 5061878" data-attributes="member: 2243"><p>I am basing my statement on facts, including the OP's prior history, his drawing and description and the citation issued. You are making your statement based on nothing more than the OP stating his biased opinion of the officer's intentions or emotional status. </p><p></p><p>It is more likely the OP was emotional, as he was receiving the citation. While the officer was performing a normal daily routine of his job. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I am inferring his guilt based on his diagram, discussion and his prior bad acts, that is called the totality of the circumstances.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You still have offered no actual objective evidence of the officer's poor attitude, other than the statement of the OP, which is biased. You have nothing else, while I referenced various bases for my conclusion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That shows no such thing. You cant quote the biased statement of a person receiving a ticket without any other objective evidence and claim it so.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This traffic stop was "weak at best?" You have got to be kidding me. An officer witnessing a dangerous traffic violation first hand is "weak at best?" Is this based on your detailed knowledge of L.E. procedure or this department's protocol? You absolutely take the cake with this statement. I will stop trying to confuse you with actual facts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FordSVTFan, post: 5061878, member: 2243"] I am basing my statement on facts, including the OP's prior history, his drawing and description and the citation issued. You are making your statement based on nothing more than the OP stating his biased opinion of the officer's intentions or emotional status. It is more likely the OP was emotional, as he was receiving the citation. While the officer was performing a normal daily routine of his job. I am inferring his guilt based on his diagram, discussion and his prior bad acts, that is called the totality of the circumstances. You still have offered no actual objective evidence of the officer's poor attitude, other than the statement of the OP, which is biased. You have nothing else, while I referenced various bases for my conclusion. That shows no such thing. You cant quote the biased statement of a person receiving a ticket without any other objective evidence and claim it so. This traffic stop was "weak at best?" You have got to be kidding me. An officer witnessing a dangerous traffic violation first hand is "weak at best?" Is this based on your detailed knowledge of L.E. procedure or this department's protocol? You absolutely take the cake with this statement. I will stop trying to confuse you with actual facts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
I am in a really bad situation.....
Top