Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Tuning À la carte
How possible is a hybid fuel system in a 2000 mustang?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="robert presti" data-source="post: 15269460" data-attributes="member: 175530"><p>That's how many Mopars and newer cars do it. I guess at this point I'm doing it the old school way with the regulator after the fuel rail. I'm not going to run y connections to the fuel rails or regulator despite getting close to recommendations. I'm running an 8an fuel and return line with a 13303 fuel pressure regulator. I have two 450 lph fuel pumps. </p><p></p><p>I 'm over kill on the regulator and return line if the fuel pumps will do what I want them to in the ford return less mode. This is somewhat of an experiment so I went big so that nearly 100% fuel pump in a return fuel is possible. This started out as a goal of being able to have one fuel pump fail and still not blow the engine. I bought the somewhat wrong fuel pumps for the return less system, but had I bought the right ones without the check valves it wouldn't matter. The fuel pressure would bleed back into the tank of the failed pump and blow my engine.</p><p></p><p>My first thought is to tell the ford return less fuel to target 40 psi and set the mechanical regulator to 42.This would allow the fp9000267 fuel pumps the ability to bleed off over pressure errors, and I think not confuse the fuel system. I also think about running it over the mechanical regulator to ensure fuel delivery though. Not sure what the fuel system learning limitations are.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="robert presti, post: 15269460, member: 175530"] That's how many Mopars and newer cars do it. I guess at this point I'm doing it the old school way with the regulator after the fuel rail. I'm not going to run y connections to the fuel rails or regulator despite getting close to recommendations. I'm running an 8an fuel and return line with a 13303 fuel pressure regulator. I have two 450 lph fuel pumps. I 'm over kill on the regulator and return line if the fuel pumps will do what I want them to in the ford return less mode. This is somewhat of an experiment so I went big so that nearly 100% fuel pump in a return fuel is possible. This started out as a goal of being able to have one fuel pump fail and still not blow the engine. I bought the somewhat wrong fuel pumps for the return less system, but had I bought the right ones without the check valves it wouldn't matter. The fuel pressure would bleed back into the tank of the failed pump and blow my engine. My first thought is to tell the ford return less fuel to target 40 psi and set the mechanical regulator to 42.This would allow the fp9000267 fuel pumps the ability to bleed off over pressure errors, and I think not confuse the fuel system. I also think about running it over the mechanical regulator to ensure fuel delivery though. Not sure what the fuel system learning limitations are. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Tuning À la carte
How possible is a hybid fuel system in a 2000 mustang?
Top