Had a brand new 5.0 on the dyno

Greg@RET

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
1,931
Location
SoCal
Another one currently being strapped down with exhaust, I will keep you guys posted.
 

Greg@RET

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
1,931
Location
SoCal
372/356
371/354

Letting it cool down a bit then will make another pull. I would say the catback is good for 10rwhp across the board. Might put a intake on in a bit.

**Catback stick car, with the top down lol**:thumbsup: BTW this is uncorrected HP
 
Last edited:

Greg@RET

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
1,931
Location
SoCal
After cool down it made 373/357 BTW 1:1 is still a 4th gear pull, tried 5th and thats a no go, speed limiter is at 141.
 
Last edited:

65mph_Roll

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
605
Location
CA
4th is not 1:1

5.0 GT ratios are:

1st 3.66:1
2nd 2.43:1
3rd 1.69:1
4th 1.32:1
5th 1.00:1
6th 0.65:1
 

65mph_Roll

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
605
Location
CA
After cool down it made 373/357 BTW 1:1 is still a 4th gear pull, tried 5th and thats a no go, speed limiter is at 141.

4th is not 1:1

5.0 GT ratios are:

1st 3.66:1
2nd 2.43:1
3rd 1.69:1
4th 1.32:1
5th 1.00:1
6th 0.65:1
 

gabe1530

Banned
Joined
Jan 25, 2009
Messages
5,401
Location
CA.
damn Greg sound like you got your hands full!

any update on that GT with exhaust that you guys were going to put the intake on?
 

ON D BIT

Finish First
Established Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2003
Messages
16,212
Location
Currently in Sonoma County
372/356
371/354

Letting it cool down a bit then will make another pull. I would say the catback is good for 10rwhp across the board. Might put a intake on in a bit.

**Catback stick car, with the top down lol**:thumbsup: BTW this is uncorrected HP

67 to 73 uncorrected sounds like the cat back is good for 5 to 10 rwhp. Was this the same car with catback or a different car with cat and no baseline? Still not enough info to start making general comments on mods I believe.

How will 1.32:1 effect dyno numbers?:shrug:
 

1Quick4.6

Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
842
Location
hidden
67 to 73 uncorrected sounds like the cat back is good for 5 to 10 rwhp. Was this the same car with catback or a different car with cat and no baseline? Still not enough info to start making general comments on mods I believe.

How will 1.32:1 effect dyno numbers?:shrug:

it would make them a tad low. as stated though you hit the top speed limiter in 5th and can't get threw the whole rpm unless it has a tune to remove that
 
Last edited:

Sir Nate 3000

Silver Stallion
Established Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Messages
401
Location
Georgia
After cool down it made 373/357 BTW 1:1 is still a 4th gear pull, tried 5th and thats a no go, speed limiter is at 141.

I want to see the numbers on this car with a full 5th gear pull. I don't think the numbers will change much.
 
Last edited:

PSUCOBRA96

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
9,210
Location
Maryland
Just for those wondering 5.0 mustang magazine just did a dyno of the 2011 and wanted to test the argument about which gear to dyno in, well

4th gear produced 381.84 hp & 342.09 tq while

5th gear produced 366.75 hp and 335.96 tq meaning the car lost hp and tq in 5th compared to the 4th gear pull
 

HISSMAN

The Great Bearded One
Super Moderator
Joined
May 21, 2003
Messages
25,633
Location
WV
Just for those wondering 5.0 mustang magazine just did a dyno of the 2011 and wanted to test the argument about which gear to dyno in, well

4th gear produced 381.84 hp & 342.09 tq while

5th gear produced 366.75 hp and 335.96 tq meaning the car lost hp and tq in 5th compared to the 4th gear pull

In any case, 5th is the 1:1, but until the speed limiter is turned off, 4th will have to do.
 

Bob Cosby

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2001
Messages
1,309
Location
Sherman, TX
Just for those wondering 5.0 mustang magazine just did a dyno of the 2011 and wanted to test the argument about which gear to dyno in, well

4th gear produced 381.84 hp & 342.09 tq while

5th gear produced 366.75 hp and 335.96 tq meaning the car lost hp and tq in 5th compared to the 4th gear pull

Were they able to take the 5th gear pull all the way to redline? Are the graphs online by chance?
 

TVSCobra

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
2,551
Location
Georgia
Heres the 4 pulls SAE.... 100% stock with 100 miles on the motor. DYNOJET 224
353/332
354/333
362/350
346/344

Uncorrected 4 pulls
359/338
358/337
367/355
351/349

The funny thing is the a/f stayed at 14.6 until the very top of the run on the first 2 pulls. The second 2 pulls the a/f looked good right under 13. I will get the pics and graphs up later.

Aren't those numbers a bit low from the other dyno results that have been posted? I know you have to take dyno numbers with a grain of salt, but this is the lowest I have seen yet.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top