Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
GT500 vs Boss 302
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Robert M" data-source="post: 16251095" data-attributes="member: 9628"><p>On the "100 pounds weight savings" in the nose that is widely quoted for the 2011-up GT500 because of the alum. block, does the EPS also contribute to weight savings or does the EPS motor counter the cast iron Hyd. P/S pump w/steel pulley, reservoir, rubber/steel lines and fluid and they are about even from a P/S weight stand point?..............or is the alum. block only more like an 85 pounds saving if the hyd. P/S is kept in place on an earlier car?</p><p></p><p>R</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Robert M, post: 16251095, member: 9628"] On the "100 pounds weight savings" in the nose that is widely quoted for the 2011-up GT500 because of the alum. block, does the EPS also contribute to weight savings or does the EPS motor counter the cast iron Hyd. P/S pump w/steel pulley, reservoir, rubber/steel lines and fluid and they are about even from a P/S weight stand point?..............or is the alum. block only more like an 85 pounds saving if the hyd. P/S is kept in place on an earlier car? R [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
GT500 vs Boss 302
Top